After a long wait and an endless amount of media speculation, the Productivity Commission has released its draft inquiry report on Childcare and Early Childhood Learning.
One of the key features of the proposals is what many were counting on – the ability to claim back the costs of nannies.
The average out-of-pocket cost of childcare in Australia is 27 per cent of the average wage — which is less than in Britain, the US, New Zealand or Canada. However the number of women who work has increased in the past two decades – from 57 to 66 per cent – and the bill for childcare costs has also grown, with some families finding its financially just too difficult to send their kids to childcare.
With more than 40 per cent of children aged 12 years or under using some type of informal care on a regular basis, and nearly one in four parents working part time being unable to work more hours due to unmet demand for childcare, there is a desperate need for an overhaul of the system.
Some of the submission details concern over stay-at-home mums taking much needed child care spots: “But the reality of childcare is that it should be more directed at working families. Spots can be filled by stay at home mums … just looking for time off from the baby for a cheap ‘babysitting’ rate,” wrote one contributor. While others were concerned with the lack of after school care: “My eldest daughter attends Leichhardt Public which in 2014 will have 650 students but only 180 spots for after school care. I have friends whose second child cannot access this service as they are full – and they are on the priority list. Next year will be even worse.”
Top Comments
Wow, women can really rip into each other, just reading through posts below, working mums and stay at home mums casting aspersion. I don't think anyone of us can presume to know what it is like being the other, what the other know, what knowledge they have or that one way is better, the one thing I do see that should form solidarity is that all these women are trying their best, each is different in the way they are facing the very challenging world we live in coupled with the hard job that is motherhood, each I dare say has complete love for their child. I just wish we could pat each other on the back and say "I see what you are doing and it is hard isn't it, you're doing ok, I am doing ok, if there is a way we can support each other and make life easier then let's do it".
That has never been the reality of this issue. The "working mums" brigade clearly view stay-at-home mums as failures to their cause. Stay-at-home mums are portrayed as holding back equal rights for other women and even as damaging the economy.
I recall one leading feminist spokesperson, some years ago, arguing that families with a stay-at-home mum should actually be taxed on the notional value of the domestic duties they provide for free, because two-income families had to pay someone else to perform those same duties. That's right, she thought lower-income families should pay more tax, on less income, because they ate less take-away meals.
And you wonder why stay-at-home mums find it hard to treat the other side with respect?
Are they removing the cap of $7500 per child? If so, then I can see their proposal as a fair one.
I think we also need to stop finger pointing at who does or doesn't need assistance to pay for childcare. The reality is that childcare costs a fortune even with government assistance.
It's so important that we get this right for the long term benefit of everyone.