To catch up on all things royal family, make sure you check out our Royal Hub. We’ve got you completely covered.
When Princess Beatrice was 17, she fell in love with the wrong man.
It was 2005, and the princess started dating her “first love” Paolo Liuzzo in secret. But the relationship did not result in a happily ever after.
Three years before the relationship began, in 2002, Liuzzo was charged with the manslaughter of a fellow student during a brawl in the US, a sentence which was later reduced to assault. He was served a community sentence.
But in May 2006, in the midst of his relationship with Beatrice, the manslaughter charges re-emerged in the media, and the couple were forced to end their relationship.
Following the breakup, there were rumours that Liuzzo had flouted the conditions of his probation to holiday with Beatrice and her family in Switzerland, but that was not where Beatrice’s ties to Liuzzo truly ended.
In 2007, a year after the couple had parted ways, Liuzzo reportedly publicly embarrassed the family with claims that marijuana was smoked in the presence of Beatrice and her mother Sarah Ferguson on a family holiday in Jamaica.
Later, in 2009, though unrelated to the princess, the Courier Mail reports Liuzzo was fined $5000 for crashing into street lights, failing to return a hire car, paying a hotel bill with an expired credit card and being caught with cocaine on the Gold Coast during a holiday to Australia.
By that point, Beatrice had been with her boyfriend of a decade, Dave Clark, for three years.
Beatrice and Dave reportedly met in 2006 whilst studying at The University of Edinburgh, where Beatrice was introduced to Dave through her cousin, Prince William.
The initial meeting occurred at Pierce Brosnan’s son Sean’s party, and the pair instantly hit it off.
Top Comments
I suggest the writer checks her 'facts'. David Cameron may not be too pleased to find he has been described as dead while very much alive. This sort of reporting brings into questiion any 'facts' presented by the author and by extension the siite.
In this case, I think the writer has constructed the sentence poorly rather than failing to fact check. I believe she is stating that Christopher Shale died of a heart attack, but agree the construction of the sentence leaves room for confusion.
First, you're assuming that she's had a "long search for love" as though that's an important thing in her life, or that she's somehow devalued without it. Second, she's a young woman with several previous relationships, some with less-than-nice individuals. Again, hardly a revelation or surprising. Most people have failed relationships in their past. You're not suggesting this is any different or more important for her, because she's a princess, are you?
Exactly! "Luckily she had love in her life"???? She seems to have a very close family and presumably good friends so I'd suggest she has love in her life without having a romantic partner...
Not only that, she's also got a job too. But yeah, all irrelevant because clearly her most important, affirming goal in life is to find love. Heaven forbid she ends up a lonely old spinster!
This article sounds like my Nan wrote it. A young lady cant be left on the shelf too long you know!