For everything Prince Harry, Meghan Markle and the Royal Wedding in one convenient place, visit our Royal Wedding hub.
Sometimes it’s important for women everywhere to take the weight of feminism off their shoulders, put on a tiara, sip champagne, and watch as one of the most privileged and historically problematic families celebrate a very fancy wedding.
Last Saturday was one of those days.
Many of us were surprised, however, when the wedding of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry broke a number of royal traditions, making us feel just a little less guilty about enjoying such a bizarrely nationalistic spectacle.
Yes, the event was still an obscene display of unimaginable wealth. And yes, most of us fundamentally disagree with what it represents.
But given Prince Harry’s role as the ‘spare’ rather than the ‘heir’ in the British royal family, his wedding was a stark contrast to the other royal wedding that sits most clearly in recent memory – that of Prince William and Kate Middleton.
So in the spirit of taking a break from feminism and fawning over the details of two exceptionally beautiful days, here are the 12 biggest differences between the last two British royal weddings.
1. Dress
While Meghan Markle wore a simple, elegant boat neck dress by Givenchy, with a dramatically long lace veil, Middleton wore an Alexander McQueen gown with lace detail and a shorter veil. It’s thought Markle’s exceptionally long veil was a way to honour her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana, whose veil was similar.
Top Comments
I don't think you can call the guest list for William and Catherine's wedding understated because it didn't include Oprah and George Clooney. Their guest list included foreign royalty, Commonwealth governors-general and prime ministers, along with other heads of state and dignitaries. That guest list packed more actual punch than a couple of random A listers and some actors from a show the vast majority of people hadn't heard of a year ago.
Yes, kind of telling when someone thinks having a bunch of random entertainment celebrities is more impressive than people with real political power and influence.
“Impressive”?. How about instead bringing in the people they are truly more comfortable with?...
"Nonetheless, they're two weddings we'll no doubt be fawning over for decades to come."
Speak for yourself. The majority have already moved on. Suggest you try to catch up.