Sitting alone, a phone pressed to her ear and a voice recorder poised, 21-year-old Queensland woman Elka waited for the man on the other end to answer. A man who only recently had allegedly pinned her down, laid on top of her naked, and sexually assaulted her.
“Hello,” she said when he picked up. “I just want to talk about what’s happened.”
As reported by ABC’s Lateline on Tuesday, the conversation took place at the suggestion of police, as part of an investigative technique known as a ‘pretext’ call. This involves the victim of an alleged crime attempting to elicit a confession from the suspect during a secretly recorded phone conversation.
Given physical evidence is rarely enough to establish an absence of consent, an admission like this can be can be a powerful tool for the prosecution in sexual assault cases; an area of the law in which convictions are notoriously hard to achieve (in NSW, for example, only 8.5 per cent of reports of sex offences lead to successful prosecution in 2015).
Yet some victim advocates have expressed concern that the technique may, in fact, be detrimental to the person reporting the violence, that confronting their alleged attacker can compound their trauma.
Karen Willis, Executive Officer of Rape and Domestic Violence Services Australia, told Mamamia that participating in such investigative techniques will impact people differently, and thus police need to be “very careful” in the way they handle its implementation.
“I’ve spoken to some women who have felt really quite empowered by getting the person to admit over the phone what happened and knowing that’s really good evidence. For others, though, it’s proven absolutely horrible to try and pretend to have a conversation with someone who has just sexually assaulted you,” Willis said.