— With AAP.
1. “Full of self-pitying cr*p.” UK TV host’s blistering attack on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
British TV host Piers Morgan has criticised Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in the wake of their documentary that focuses on their trip to South Africa in September.
In the documentary, the Duchess of Sussex described the past year as a member of the royal family as “hard” and admitted she was not prepared for the intensity of tabloid interest.
“I don’t think anybody could understand that, but in all fairness I had no idea, which probably sounds difficult to understand.”
Piers Morgan, host of Good Morning Britain, posted a number of tweets that showed no sympathy for the royals.
“Imagine being two staggeringly privileged royal multi-millionaires going to Africa to make a documentary that supposedly ‘shines a light’ on poverty, violence against women/girls & racial inequality – then in fact making it all about their own terrible struggle?” the controversial television host wrote.
Imagine being two staggeringly privileged royal multi-millionaires going to Africa to make a documentary that supposedly ‘shines a light’ on poverty, violence against women/girls & racial inequality – then in fact making it all about their own terrible struggle? I mean, FFS. pic.twitter.com/YCm9qAgzAd
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) October 21, 2019
Top Comments
I'm SO SICK of the comments from Federal ministers about "animal welfare being a state responsibility". States have responsibility for animal welfare pre slaughter and at DOMESTIC abattoirs. The cruelty that was filmed happened in an EXPORT abattoir. Therefore, it's a Federal responsibility.
Worst example I've ever seen was when a voter in New England begged their local member to help with the water crisis in their region.
At the time, Barnaby Joyce the Deputy PM, NAT Leader, and Minister for Water simply retorted with "it's a state issue."
We get the fact that Piers Morgan doesn't like Meghan & Harry but to use his position to publicly and consistently criticize them is pathetic.
I do have one thing to say about their use of private jets - Security and terrorism.
Those two would have to be in the "terrorist's top ten" of potential victims.
In fact - I reckon I'd be a bit uneasy if I found out they were on my commercial flight.
I haven't seen much of those interviews but to not feel some empathy and sympathy for two people who are just trying to do their jobs (whether you agree with their jobs or not ) is pretty sad.
Meanwhile, William flies commercial with all three of his kids, and nobody jumps up and down about "security and terrorism" - despite all of them being higher up in the line of succession than Harry. Inconsistency, much?
They all fly commerical occasionally, except for the Queen; you'd have to look at how often each of them did it rather than Kate & William's choice (made just days after Meghan & Harry drew criticism for flying on Elton John's private jet - note that they don't actually own one themselves)
William and Kate have been flying commercially for longer than Harry and Meghan have even known each other - it's not a new thing. Apparently it's OK to fly privately in Elton's jet so long as you buy carbon offsets. It's the poors who need to stop flying places - the rich and privileged have a caveat, you see.
Wills didn’t serve in Afghanistan or marry a black woman. No one is trying to bring down the British monarchy (Britain has bigger issues), but there are people who commit terrorist attacks inspired by white supremacy and anti-western feelings.
Besides I’d bet a lot William has been on his fair share of private jets. Not to mention Andrew’s time on the Lolita Express.