1. Phillip Hughes still critical
Cricketer Phillip Hughes remains in a critical condition after being struck on the head by a cricket ball while playing in a match at the Sydney Cricket Ground on Wednesday afternoon.
Cricket Australia team doctor, Peter Brukner, said last night that the 25-year-old remained in an induced coma.
“Phillip’s condition is unchanged and he remains critical,” Dr Brukner said.
“If there are any further developments we will let you know immediately.”
Questions now have emerged over the time it took for an emergency response to Phillip Hughes with Fairfax Media reporting that it took more than an hour from when Hughes was struck by the ball until he arrived at St Vincent’s Hospital for emergency surgery.
2. Ferguson officer Darren Wilson first interview
The police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in the US suburb of Ferguson has given his first interview saying there was “no way” that teenager Michael Brown had his hands up right before he was killed.
One of the core controversies of the case has been the theory that Brown held up his hands to signal his surrender. Wilson said they were “incorrect.”
“The reason I have a clean conscience is I know I did my job right,” Wilson said saying he would have taken the same actions had Brown, who was black, been a white man.
3. Michael Brown’s parents respond
The parents of Michael Brown have responded to the interview on CBS’s Today Show saying that Wilson’s description of their son was crazy.
Top Comments
Such a sad lot of stories, this really is a cold old world!
re the Michael Brown's shooting death. And the death of the 12 year old boy with a toy gun in the park the other day in Ohio: Obama needs to do more than just pay this lip service. This needs full and comprehensive investigation and massive changes to be implemented. What is going on there? The police are saying they were fearing for their lives. Does this hold any basis in fact? (are there many police officers losing their lives in parts of the US for example?). Even if this was true, how on earth does this translate to police shooting unarmed teenage/young boys? How can a policeman not tell the difference between a toy gun and a real gun? Are there issues with 3D printed guns coming onto the market in the US (they can look like toys) and/or do police officers hold that perception, even if it's not true? Are the police poorly trained to handle confrontations? And finally, racial bias is undisputedly playing a part, so how deep does it run and what can they actually do to address that. Because they really really need to do something.
I actually don't see how it is necessarily racial bias. The biggest killer of African-American people in America is other African-Americans. The problem here is the same we've had here in QLD recently - officers are taught to shoot to kill, not shoot to wound. Just because it's a white man shooting a black man, does not automatically make it racial.
I am afraid I disagree wholeheartedly. And maybe more African Americans kill other African Americans, I'm unaware of the actual numbers. But even if they do, we are talking about the killing of African Americans by police. This deserves scrutiny in its own right.
The reason I say I disagree with your statement that it's not necessarily racial bias is because I know there is racial bias in the American criminal/judicial system. There are tons of scholarly articles out there that show evidence for this very fact. And I know they can be hard to access if you don't have the right subscriptions, but a good documentary that covers racial bias in the American system (amongst other factors) is one we got shown by our criminology lecturer, called (I think) 'Visions of abolition'. If you can track that down, it's a good starting point for some of the issues.
African Americans *do not* offend at higher rates than other racial groups in America (when you look at studies which examine offending rates). Yet they are arrested, convicted and incarcerated at much higher rates. So yes, there is definitely racial bias going on.
It would be reasonable to assume police officers in the US are at a greater risk of injury or death than the police officers in Australia, for example the sheer number of people including children with guns in the US, if an officer was to attend a park because of a call saying that a person had a gun it would be reasonable to assume that somebody did have one, so when at that park somebody points what looks like a gun at you are you going to wait or are you going to protect yourself?, I think even here in Australia most people understand that you don't point anything at American police. Add to that the use of drugs like ice and others where users just keep on coming (I have seen a video where 1 man was attacking two police officers who were both using their tasers on him and he just kept on coming or he'd get up and attack again) if you are on your own what other choice do you have. I agree its a bad situation and some of them probably get it wrong but at the end of the day they have families they all want to go home too and if you comply with their directions you'll get to go home or jail if your guilty alive as well
I think there is a heavy culture of racism amongst the US police, that might not be prevalent amongst (many of) the rest of Americans.
http://time.com/3594636/fer...