FIRST POKIES STUDY REVEALS POOR CHARITY STATUS
In New South Wales alone, poker machines raked in almost $5 billion for the 2010-11 financial year. That’s a little more than $1000 per adult.
In Victoria, gamblers lost $2.6 billion on machines.
Yet in each state, only around $60 million was donated to community organisations and charities. That’s 1.3 per cent and 2.4 per cent of losses respectively.
The Monash University study found:
”Since poker machine losses are very large … the amounts expended on community benefit purposes appear to be large themselves. But as a proportion of losses such claims are minimal,” the research found.
”Poker machines thus provide an extremely inefficient and high cost method for funding community sporting and charitable activities.”
The research was commissioned by UnitingCare Australia.
SPERM DONOR CHILDREN WILL BE ABLE TO FIND THEIR BROTHERS AND SISTER
Which might offer some peace of mind to those worried about ‘unintentional incest’. The program, known as Donor SibLinks, would release basic details such as gender, month and year of birth and provide them on a database if half-siblings request information.
Despite research showing that the chances of such an encounter are infinitely small, IVF Australia’s leading professor, Peter Illingworth, said the issue remained a serious concern for parents.
Prof Illingworth said: “Concern among donor sperm parents is (that) their child might in the future unknowingly meet a half-sibling and as a result of that, get into an incestuous relationship.
Top Comments
If I worked at IAG and chose to voluntarily take 3 months off work to benefit myself and my family, or perhaps do a volunteer project, or care for an ill loved one, would they pay me double my wage when I returned? Would they pay me to take time off to do those things?
Surely these are all worthy reasons to take some time off yet there is no financial benefit for people in those situations, why are mothers treated different;y?
It's simple risk management. Your return is pretty much guarenteed, there's no need for a business to try harder to keep you.
Businesses recognise they lose a disproportionate number of skilled women when those women take maternity leave, and they want to ensure that their business retains the best.
I already feel guilty for the amount of maternity allowance i get. I guess I am in a very lucky position