It’s Tuesday and you’ve likely had a little time to get over the sheer wonder that was Monday. Now it’s time to delve into another day but you couldn’t possibly do it without a hit of what’s happening out there beyond your bedroom. Easy! We’ve prepared everything you’ll need right here so you’ll be switched on and clever before you even leave your bathrobe.
Be honest. We have bathrobes too.
So, without further ado, the news:
1. The (civil) case against swimmer Nick D’Arcy continues in court.
It was the punch-up that stopped a nation. Swimmer Nick D’Arcy hit fellow team-mate Simon Cowley in March 2008 and was dumped from the Beijing Olympic team before later pleading guilty to inflicting grievous bodily harm. Now Simon Cowley is suing, claiming the medical bills alone cost $40,000 and the mental anguish much, much more. Possibly up to $750,000. The case continues.
2. Libya has been bombed for 100 days now…
… and not a lot has changed. NATO forces (mainly France and America) have been launching air strikes on key Libyan strongholds and targets to try and protect the rebels from a surging Libyan ground force. The rebels were threatened with violence after they began protesting against the decades long rule of Muammar Gaddafi. Not much has changed in the balance of power but rebels say NATO has prevented a massacre in the eastern rebel stronghold of Benghazi.
UPDATE: As of late this morning, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam and Libya’s intelligence chief for ‘crimes against humanity’. This is one more step in the push to have Gaddafi removed.
3. Big Tobacco launches legal action against Federal Government
Top Comments
We should totally call this bathrobe news. That's what I'm doing! (o:
No one has touched on "Big Tobacco launches legal action against Federal Government" topic yet. I find this really frustrating - I'm antismoking, not a smoker and yet I feel I have to side with the tobacco companies here. If anything, I find this to be a waste of time. First, cigarettes already have to be covered (so you can't see the packaging) behind the shop keeper and secondly, if having a set of decaying teeth and cancerous toe or limb on your packet of cigarettes isn't going to stop you from smoking, then how is plain packaging? I also think this is a ploy from other big companies (like woolworths or coles) to get in on selling tobacco. Once brands are removed, anyone will be able to sell cigarettes in plain packaging - if anything, increasing the amount of smokers! I don't really know the ins and outs of this argument, but I feel this is not the best way to fight smoking. Surely something more intelligent could be done?