The final episode of Missing Richard Simmons has landed. Not with a thud, or a bang, but a sort of dirty, sticky carpet feeling.
The podcast, which tried to find out why fitness mogul Richard Simmons suddenly disappeared from the public eye, has dominated podcast watercooler chat since it launched in February.
I’ve written about how ethically murky this journey into privacy invasion was, and this episode, the sixth and final, confirmed it for me.
The host Dan Taberski, a ‘friend’ of Richards, says at the beginning of this episode, that landed, curiously, two days early, that they had to pull a lot of material. Right up until 24 hours before the final episode went to air. Which is either code for ‘legal problems’, or ‘the morality question has finally caught up with us’ or just ‘this is awful’. I think the former.
I never believed the line that they were reporting it in real time.
‘Of course they know how this ends’ I would assure myself to assuage feelings of unease about what was unfolding.
Back when it launched I was surprised at the risk it was taking delving into the life of someone who ostensibly had chosen to become a recluse. It seemed an outrageous invasion of privacy. And I reached out to the makers of this podcast to ask whether the ethical implications of outing Richard Simmons were a factor before they decided to publish this podcast. To find out whether psychologist or experts were consulted on risk management aspects.
Top Comments
Agreed! Although the series was well made and highly entertaining at times, the final episode was such a let down. The whole thing feels icky.