I’ve learned a lot in the three years since I became a national object of hate for suggesting sports people aren’t heroes.
So yesterday, when I woke up to the news that Aussie tennis player Nick Kyrgios had beaten World Number 1 Rafael Nadal at Wimbledon and the entire country went nuts, I kept my big mouth shut.
And not just because my Dad texted me first thing in the morning to say:
It was excellent advice and he knows me very well but I’d already come to the same conclusion.
Back in 2011, I made so many mistakes when, in my usual weekly appearance on Today to discuss the news of the day, I was asked to comment on the hero status of Australian cyclist Cadel Evans who had, just hours ago, won the Tour de France.
As someone who is deaf to sport – and the public mood surrounding it – I blindly launched into an ill-timed rant about how I thought sports people weren’t heroes at all. To me, I told co-host Karl Stefanovic, heroism implies self-sacrifice. Soldiers, volunteers, emergency services personnel, charity workers, scientists, social workers…. people who put the lives of others and the betterment of the world above their own personal goals or gratification.
Why do we place so much emphasis on people who are good at sport, Karl, why?
As the temperature in the studio plumetted and Karl spluttered in horror, I blustered on, complaining that our national obsession with sporting achievement stole all the media oxygen from coverage of other kinds of heroic achievement. A value system that prized physical skills over all others was one I strongly disagreed with, I ranted.
Top Comments
Sports people may be inspiring to some, if not the majority of Australians, but you were right the first time: heroes they are not.
They may be very good at what they do and they may lift the spirits of many, but they still aren't heroes. Sure, I felt good for Krygios that he achieved what he did. I felt even better for his Mum who was taking it all in her stride in such a normal, Mum-like manner, despite being pushed around by media people wanting to get their slice of the action - their own bit of "exclusive, live-to-air" fame.
Your initial thoughts on the subject were correct. Heroism should be about self sacrifice - ie, putting in the hard work for the greater good, not doing something you love for personal fame and fortune.
Sport isn't heroism. For most, it's a job - doing something the competitors love. That a large portion of the population equate it with heroism says more about our media-driven culture, a culture of celebrity, than it does about the proper place of sport within our society. It's just sport, people. No one watching is going to die if your favourite sporting team or personality fails.
Our doctors and scientists also compete against countries ten times our size and with massively bigger budgets (much, much bigger after Abbott takes the scimitar to the science budget we do have) - but you won't see them paraded across half a dozen pages of the nation's newspapers every time they make a major breakthrough, let alone when they do what thousands have done before them.
You won't see almost entire breakfast TV shows dedicated to discussing the latest breakthrough they make in cancer research at an Australian university. Sure, it will probably rate a mention - unless it's grand final day, or we win gold in the Olympics, or someone we happen to like wins a game of tennis.