It’s funny how statistics don’t mean much until someone you love becomes one.
Yesterday, my 23-year-old brother finished Uni for the day and went to get some lunch.
He was stopped in a car park with his window down, when a man approached his car.
The man was clearly in a rage. He started yelling about his own car, which had been parked down the street.
He yelled: “Was it you who damaged my car?”
And before my brother could finish his sentence – “I didn’t do…” – the man punched him square in the face.
My brother looked down, shocked, at the blood that was pouring all over his jumper and jeans.
He ended up spending the afternoon in hospital, getting stitches in his busted lip. To make matters worse, the cut was such that it made more sense for the doctor to perform the stitches with no anesthetic.
Top Comments
pretty much what I have been trying to say on here for years, yet I get mocked ("the menz") and silenced in the process.
Men are the larger victim of random violence in society. And because (a small) percentag eof men are most likely to be the harm doers does not somehow take away from the pain male victims face (through no fault of their own) at the hands of idiots.
Thanks - I guess only a woman can say it and be heard these days.
Only because you bring it up on articles about violence against women or anything to do with women. Plus you have added bitterness and scorn towards women on top of trying to divert attention away from women's issues.
Now you have your space. You have what you want now. A discussion about an issue affecting men. Now you may discuss violence against men because this article is about violence against men.
It's not what you were saying, but how you said it. Trying to insert it into articles about violence against women was irrelevant and distracting. Your message was lost because you kept posting irrelevant comments laced with scorn and bitterness towards women.
Think of it as like writing an essay for university. If you keep writing about violence against men when the topic is about violence against women or other issues affecting women, you would be marked down for not addressing the question. If you kept forcing the issue, even though it was not relevant to the topic at hand, the professor would most likely fail you because they were annoyed at you wasting their time.
i have no problem calling out men for their violence. Whether it is a stranger on the street, gang violence, family members, homosexual partners: it is all violence that needs to be addressed. Many young men I know suffer extreme violence at the hands of other men. Sometimes this is in a social grouping, a racial attack (I have often heard of young Indigenous males being violated), in boarding school environments, apprenticeships etc. we cannot have a decent discussion about it because people want to only see male victims at the hands of female perps, which we know is the rarest form of violence against men. If people really cared about male victims they would discuss the male perps of this violence and solutions. When people constantly refuse to believe women are not victims of male violence, that the women ARE the real offenders, we never address the real issues. Men suffer too, More often than not, at the hands of other males. Let's discuss what can be done about that.
The puncher is always an angry man though.
More often than not without his father in his life. As the point was made in the Australian cartoon this week.
and this takes away from the innocent victim how? This line, all too common, is illogical.
How is that even relevant? A victim is a victim.
I'm assuming you are a woman, so if you got a glass smashed and ground into your face requiring 27 stitches and plastic surgery you would flippantly dismiss it because your attacker was female so that evens it up. It's a ridiculous and biased argument.
Well it's not likely to be a calm or happy man