1. Samantha Markle will reportedly make $180,000 from the birth of Meghan Markle’s baby.
The Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister Samantha Markle has become infamous for her savage attacks on the royal family. And it seems she won’t be stopping her nasty antics any time soon, with reports that she could be making up to $180,000 upon the arrival of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s baby.
According to The Mirror, Markle, 53, has planned two television documentaries, talk show appearances and a book, with hopes to garner media attention, like she did during the royal wedding in May last year.
Her rate? A cool £2,000-an-hour for interviews, which translates to just over $3,500 Australian.
All up she will apparently earn £100,000, converting to $180,000 Australian.
Top Comments
Why exactly would anyone pay money to Samantha Markle after the baby is born, other than to get ratings by stirring the pot? She hasn’t spoken to her sister in years, has never met Harry, will not have seen the baby. She’ll know nothing about the circumstances of the birth. Anyone who interviews her is just hoping she’ll say something shocking/offensive, to rile people up.
Pippa and James Middleton both cashed in (with various projects, although not a 'tell all' book) when their sister married the future King of England, so why not Samantha Markle?
because they Aren't saying mean and untruthful stuff. Of course Megan hasn't given any money to her sister (as the article states), my brother doesn't give me money just because he earns more! And I would say it's fair enough to earn some money, but really, she is just being paid to say lies and make trouble. It's sickening and it should be illegal. Would really like all ethical newsites to block all Markle relatives. Mamamia, please stand up for ethical standards!
Blocking Markle's relatives from newsites would be a PR disaster for the Royal Family and considered an assault on free speech in the USA. Harry married a woman with family baggage and it is up to him and Meghan to somehow sort it out.