Matthew Newton appeared on A Current Affair last night to answer some tough questions about his very public derailment over the past few years.
You can watch the interview here
Whatever your feelings about him (or ACA), it was pretty gripping television.
Does he owe the Australian public an apology? Certainly not, but one would think that Brooke Satchwell, Rachel Taylor and whomever else he’s belted over the years might get a look in while he’s establishing his own victim status on prime time television.
He wouldn’t want to cause them any further embarrassment he tells us, or bring the incidents any more attention, though by the very act of committing to a lengthy interview with A Current Affair he is doing exactly that, isn’t he?
Matthew is effusive when it comes to his own suffering, peppering his conversation with words like destruction, harm, panic, scars, breakdown, devastated, sad – all in an effort to help us understand what he’s been through. He turns a question about his final assault on Brooke Satchwell into an answer about his escape from a psych ward and his concussion. Matthew’s conviction for that assault was quashed, but he doesn’t feel he got off too easily he assures us, he feels he was not treated properly at the time for his mental illness.
He’s right about that of course. Late diagnosis after years of misdiagnosis is the greatest frustration of many sufferers, and many more family members who suffer alongside them. Matthew’s talent for articulating his experience is a gift few share and he was able to explain some aspects of his illnesses – which he says include “manic depression, acute obsessive compulsive disorder and some personality traits connected to those two” – honestly and with candor. He says he is now on daily medication to treat his health.
Top Comments
Meshel - all Matthew Newton and people like him hear is condemnation from people like you. People who dont have or understand the mental problems he has, who nevertheless want to label and condemn him as evil and bad. He is the last person who would go out to deliberately hurt others. He is desperately trying to explain to the people who condemn him that his actions came from physcological damage beyond his control. Instead of understanding and reacting with help and compassion you judge and condemn - heaping your blame on top of the damage already done. If you were crossing the street and you were run down and put in a wheelchair by a speeding driver would you take responsibility for how upset that made your mother? Ask Matthew if he feels bad for what his girlfriends and parents have been through and I bet the answer is yes. Ask him to take responsibility for doing that damage to him and you are asking too much, you are asking a deeply unreasonable question he cant possibly answer yes to - because he was not responsible for the damage to himself that forces him beyond his limit to act this way. Your take on Matthew and people like him is very common, and although you dont see it it is very cruel.
I'm bi polar: he's an immature, irresponsible ego maniac with an unjustified sense of entitlement.