By Dom Vukovic
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull might not be invited back to the Sydney Mardi Gras next year, after a motion was passed at the parade’s annual general meeting.
Mr Turnbull became the first sitting Prime Minister to attend a Gay and Lesbian Mardis Gras celebration when he was welcomed to the parade in March.
But at an annual general meeting on Saturday members passed a motion for him to be declared not welcome at next year’s event.
Social activist Cat Rose said members of the LBGT community were outraged about his support for the same-sex marriage plebiscite.
“In calling himself a friend of the community he’s emboldened all those homophobes and told them all their views are valid and should be respected by the community,” she said.
The Board of the Mardi Gras is considering whether to support that motion.
Earlier this month, the Federal Government’s bid to hold a plebiscite on whether to legalise same-sex marriage was defeated in the Senate.
The proposal was voted down in the Upper House 33 votes to 29.
The Federal Government maintains a plebiscite would be the quickest way to achieve same-sex marriage and one could be held in February 2017.
But the Federal Opposition, joined by an increasing number of gay and lesbian groups, argues it would result in divisive debate that would hurt vulnerable members of the community.
The plebiscite was estimated to cost $170 million.
© 2016 Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved. Read the ABC Disclaimer here.
This post originally appeared on ABC News.
Top Comments
It's important to note that Turnbull is not welcome in an official capacity; he's not banned outright.
And that they will still be taking taxpayer funding.
Yes, because otherwise they'd be unable to stage the event as expected. Taxpayer funding does sometimes pay for things that you, personally, do not like or value.
Just sometimes? 400,000 per year for Triggs to bully young uni students would be another.
If they organisers are so anti government then take a moral stand and refuse government funding, otherwise they are just grandstanding.
They're not anti-government. They're anti-government-refusing-us-rights-they-give-to-straight-people. There's a difference. You can support the idea of government, and not like some things it does.
Well the 'tolerant' left show their intolerance once again; but they should go after Bill Shorten. He was a member of a Labor government who could have passed this years ago and has just knocked back a chance to have it done and dusted by 11 Feb.
No one in their right. mind would trust a vote in Parliament with this hopeless mob of incumbents. It has to go to the people.
So LGBTI's you are going after the wrong man.
Why would you assume all lgbti people vote for the left?
How ridiculous!
It wouldn't have been 'done and dusted' by Feb 11, it would have just started a process of the coalition deciding exactly whether or not they were going to honour the result of the plebiscite, which they in no way have suggested they would do if it turned out that the Australian public was indeed in favour of marriage equality.
It's not such a ridiculous assumption if you analyse it properly.