In the first 18 months of a relationship, love is passionate. It’s exciting, its new, its science.
In 18 months you hear the birds singing, even at 2am when you’ve driven home from making out all night. You lay on your bed and the butterflies dance around your stomach and all in the room.
I’ll never forget the morning after Domenic and I first kissed. The world had a lighter filter on it. (Totally used a new age metaphor, who am I?) Everyone who knew me knew that after 18 months, my relationships struggle. Why do they struggle? Because just like science suggests there’s only 18 months of passionate love, it also suggests passionate love becomes the companionate type of love.
For those of you playing at home, the technical term ‘companionate love’ is a non-passionate type of love that is stronger than friendship because of the element of long-term commitment. This type of love is observed in long-term marriages where passion is no longer present but where a deep affection and commitment remain.
To me, it means your relationship has become B O R I N G.
I’m the type of girl who believes in fairy tales, that love can still have passion 10 years, 20 years later, where companionate love and passionate love can coexist. Give me a mixture of The Notebook and 50 Shades of Grey.
Top Comments
I hate to break it to you but this is not a revelation to most emotionally mature adults. It's good to see you managed to grow up though - and realise the correct application of the many meanings of the word passion. 1) sexual lust.. boo boo 2) long and abiding fondness or interest ....tick. Most guys just know this, and expect love to change and settle love time. Romantic culture and this single peice of semantic equivocation of the word "passion!!!!" has been the source of many a divorce and unhappy relationship I'm sure.Your husband is lucky his girl finally worked out how to be a woman.
What a patronising and sexist comment!
"Most guys just know this..." bahaha, what?
A lot of women (emotionally immature ones) tend to expect fireworks all the time, and often leave partners because the "spark" is gone etc etc. In reality, this is often just because their expectations of what a long term relationship should be like is warped by popular culture and the media.
Men rarely have this problem, and are quite content with the simple things, I have never once heard the above rhetoric from any male I've ever met. It's Hardly patronizing when she virtually said this herself - "I realised all the other times I had made excuses and me never once initiated going out because I expected him to do it"
She basically had a princess mentality and expected her husband to be an entertainer - his responsibility to keep her from the struggles of boredom and the mundane. She took her head out of the clouds and realised that, yeah, you both have to contribute and take responsibility for a relationships success, good for her.
She honestly still sounds kind of childish though, I mean "Who said passionate love was dead? Science doesn’t know shit! ....ah yeah OK. Couldn't possibly have been that you didn't understand what real love was about - oh wait, before the patronization police come out - she actually more or less said that as well, but then contradicts her own thinking by saying that, er ok.
Reading this kind of thing makes me realise how lucky I am to have dodged these kinds of bullets. Having a practical, emotionally mature, and sensible partner is fantastic.
There's a lot of divorces after kids leave home and I think this is one of the reasons