This post orginally appeared here on Role Reboot. It was republished here with full permission.
Samantha Eyler and her partner are committed, but spend half of each week on opposite sides of their city. She explains the background of their two-house experiment and how it’s working out so far.
Those of you who’ve ever been in love must already know that having other loves in your life is essential to keep you from smothering your other half. And if you’ve ever been an expat, you know that you can very quickly develop love-hate relationships with places.
With this in mind, I hope it won’t seem too strange to say that I am madly in love with ugly, chaotic, faceless Bogotá. Last September, when we moved to Medellín, I was broken-hearted, as if I’d been cruelly ripped away from a mistress and forced into an arranged marriage. The effects of that heartbreak on my relationship with my partner Migs have been anything but pretty. But I’m quite sure that what has saved us, amazingly, is our decision to spend two-thirds of our time away from each other.
Top Comments
I honestly can't see how they are a couple. That's not the definition of a partner. They are both sleeping around casually and also with each other. If that's your bag of tricks then good for you, but don't try to pass off an article on the 'benefits' of couples living apart when clearly neither person has an emotional/financial/physical commitment to the other.
I have very little intention of ever moving in with my partner too. I believe a bit of distance keeps the spark alive in a relationship. I believe that individuals who each live independent, happy, fulfilling lives have better relationships.
Totally agree with you. And, I like my relationship to be about the relationship; two people choosing to be with eachother and also appreciating and maintaining individuality. I'm not interested in running a household together, Im interested in the relationship. It also helps prevent conflicts over stuff like groceries and other basic living chores.