You might have been lucky enough to miss it. Earlier this week Animals Australia released footage of Australian cattle being bludgeoned to death with a sledgehammer in Vietnam. It’s horrible and shocking, and it’s not the first time they’ve captured such ghastly treatment on film. In 2011 footage from Indonesia led to the suspension of the trade while safeguards including electronic tagging of the animals was implemented.
We feel outraged by these images, and we should. How anyone can think that it’s ok to inflict such pain and suffering on another living creature is beyond comprehension. We should question why these lives are seen to have so little value that the behaviour could in any way be justified in anyone’s mind.
And then we should we look in our own fridges.
Watch this ABC report on the shocking treatment of Australian animals overseas. (Post continues after video.)
Yes, the unspeakable cruelty that happens to some Australian animals when they leave our shores should stop, but I don’t think addressing animal welfare it’s as simple as banning live exports. In fact, there is an argument that Australia’s involvement in the industry actually provides us with a legitimate pathway to make those improvements internationally.
Calling for an end to live exports is easy because that’s a part of the industry we as consumers don’t have to feel any responsibility for.
Top Comments
Aside from fact checking, I think the approach needs to change here. Yes there are occasions of cruelty, but the industry itself is not inherently cruel. A few rogue farmers do not represent what the majority practice or condone.
There needs to be more proactive discussion, rather than sensationalist and ill researched media articles attacking food production.
Yep, you need to check a few facts in this article and working for the Agricultural Minister does not give you any expertise in the farming industry. I am so over the branding of Australian farmers as barbarians. They are not. Many videos like the one that's just emerged are absolutely fake and set-up - if you look hard enough, you'll find the proof. I personally know farmers who have had animal activists break into their property and set up 'evidence' of animal cruelty causing much more stress to the animals than the farmers would ever do. The one bit of truth you have written of is that it is the consumer that needs to take responsibility. The demands of consumers for cheap products and the big two supermarkets pandering to them does not help battling farmers at all. $1 a litre milk case in point. The majority of farmers care for their animals, it's their livelihood, you don't abuse that. BUT, it's hard to invest in improved practice when every day is a battle to put food on your own table because you've been screwed over at every turn. And, no, it's not that simple to just walk away and get another job.
I would hazard that it is not consumers pushing for lower prices but the two big supermarkets who are always trying to outdo each other, at the farmer's expense. This war has happened outside of consumers, the majority of whom feel badly for farmers and want to help. Consumers have simply taken up what is offered. It is our government that has allowed the unforgiveable monopoly that has caused the problem.
Regardless, cruelty to animals is unacceptable, for any reason.
No, it isn't easy to walk away and get another job but many, many Aussies
have to do this every day. The workforce is no longer a secure place
providing jobs for life. Workers every week lose their jobs and are forced to retrain, often when they are in their 50's and 60's. Farmers are no different.