As we all know, Labor’s shock loss at the election on the weekend has puzzled many Australians. Many of us are contemplating the politics of it all. People have doubled down, pointing fingers at individuals as either being right wing bigots or social justice lefties. With this kind of emotional backlash on show, you could be mistaken for thinking we had just voted for a new school captain, and not a federal government.
To parody a recent article doing the rounds, I’m a middle-aged female, Victorian, I live in the outer suburbs, I’m a mother and grandmother, and I split my vote between Greens and Labor. I’ve done different combinations of this over the years. I speak out and advocate for change, fighting for a society that’s inclusive of everyone. However, for some reason wanting a government to look after the people who elected them makes me a “whinging leftie *insert nasty word for vagina*”.
What on earth is a leftie anyway? I had to go and do some research for myself to see if I belonged to the “club”. According to Collins Dictionary, a leftie is “a person who is on the political left… for example; a large group of students and trendy lefties”.
Top Comments
It’s good you took a measured and considered position on your vote. I voted on different issues as we have different priorities. These may be best summarised as I voted for a party that focusses on security and wealth creation, your nominated issues were social justice and wealth redistribution. Neither of us are right or wrong, just different.
Great article.
Voting Liberal doesn't make you a racist, homophobe and voting Labor doesn't make you a marxist, socialist. We've seen 2 years of division in the US, and Brexit continues to engulf UK politics with British PM Theresa May being the latest casualty.
We need to steer back to a more civil discourse, especially journalists and political commentators.
A noble goal but hard to achieve. First social media where a group can associate is then boosted by algorithms that feed more of the stories you have read, same angle, creating a beautiful bubble or echo chamber. Second, media used to back who they thought was most popular, now they are full on tribal. If there’s a story, you know the conclusion simply by reading the masthead, Herald-Sun or Sky News or Guardian or Age. This is made worse by the almost complete breakdown of news and opinion being blended into the same article. Next you have lazy journalism turning to twitter like that’s a typical mood of the public. Twitter is about 14% of the Australian population, it’s less popular than instagram, Pinterest or LinkedIn and I saw somewhere 3% of twitter accounts make 50% of the tweets. So good luck using that as a true reflection of public feeling. On top of that big tech has very fuzzy and inconsistent rules for both promoting articles and banning users.
But in the end, to make money we have gone from quality news to clickbait and now ragebait. Deliberately hyped up controversial stories to elicit outrage and so generate more clicks and forwards.
The system is stuffed way before it gets to your eyes.
Very true, especially regarding tribalism.
Only 10-13 years ago most officeworkers would listen to 2GB during their drive, or read a copy of The Australian or the Sydney Morning Herald on the train. But now people have tuned out, and it's replaced with podcasts and smartphones.
Traditional media have lost that sense of prestige, which is a real shame.