15,000 people walked the streets of Sydney yesterday for the ‘Keep Sydney Open’ protest against the city’s new lockout laws.
The crowd – which included some of Australia’s top DJ’s, venue owners, chefs, celebrities, and musicians – battled thunderstorms and sacrificed sleep ins to have their voices heard.
15,000 people.
That’s three times the turnout of the 2015 Sydney marriage equality rally, and more than seven times the turnout for this year’s ‘Let Them Stay’ asylum seeker protest.
So why is the ‘Keep Sydney Open’ movement is yet to be taken seriously?
The Baird government’s python-like squeeze on Sydney’s once vibrant nightlife is not a ‘first world problem’.
It is not a youth-specific issue, or a tantrum because drinking rights are being revoked.
It is a sociological error that all of Sydney will soon be struggling with the consequences of; regardless of age, drinking habits, or choice of bedtime.
News coverage on the topic has been so biased in its unabashed support for the lockout laws, that many of you readers might be convinced of this utopian CBD Mike Baird is so keenly pushing.
Well, consider this the other side of the story – the real talk behind the never-ending onslaught of grim (albeit curated) facts about alcohol-related violence, drug raids, and Baird’s promise of nightlife Nirvana.
Top Comments
Is there a specific source on number of assaults per capita other than
http://www.cityofsydney.nsw...
pg.33, table 6.3 and 6.4
this one only has data for 2012 - 2015, which isn’t the specific period that is being scrutinised
This is becoming a 21st century version of the dreaded six-o'clock swill.
"Drug use has escalated in two years since the lockdown process begun. Cocaine and ecstacy use is increasing."
"The lockout laws are pushing people into unregulated and unsafe environments.
House parties and larger-scale warehouse parties are on the rise, where drug dealers and unsafe building conditions are rife"
There are always consequences to drastic actions that no-one ever thinks of (or cares about)