Two Australian women were killed last week, but most of the media coverage has missed the mark yet again by centring their stories around the men who allegedly took their lives.
In Sydney, 24-year-old Michaela Dunn was killed by a man armed with a knife on Tuesday. Her death made national news after her alleged murderer was stopped from inflicting further harm by a group of brave men who used a milk crate to pin him down in Sydney’s CBD until police were able to detain him.
In Western Australia, 26-year-old Kayla Rose Halnan was killed on Tuesday. Kayla’s body was found with a bullet wound to the chest at her place of work. Kayla was a business support officer who, just like Michaela, had her whole life ahead of her.
Women and violence, the hidden numbers. Post continues below.
But sadly, like countless other victims of homicidal men’s violence, Kayla’s death barely rated a mention and her name was obscured from news reports, with almost all the coverage focusing on the man who has since been charged with her murder.
It’s 2019 and I can’t believe I still have to write this, but for anyone who is still unsure: A murdered woman is more important than the man who killed her.
It pains me that we have heard and seen more information about the men involved than the women at the heart of the matter. In fact, news reporting of Kayla’s death has focused on the man’s former career as a boxer, his fame within his local community and his subsequent career in the construction and mining industry. Let that sink in for a minute: The media is more interested in telling us the career CV of an alleged murderer than the woman he killed.
Top Comments
Maybe I'm being too sensitive here, but is talking about his "achievements" in the headline really the best idea when there are many other far more suitable terms.
To attempt to answer your question, perhaps we pay more attention to the perpetrators in an attempt to learn about them and the common danger signs? For decades we have studied serial killers pretty much for just that purpose.
Nobody is happy about the murder of any innocent life, male or female. It’s not about everyday sexism, it’s not about the victims own behaviour, guys telling jokes, Alan Jones or how much the victim drank or what they were wearing. It’s actually simple and observable whenever we read the background of another murderer because don’t the same themes always emerge; on bail, on parole, known to police, history of mental disturbance...
It’s just this; violent and mentally unstable people should be permanently behind bars or in secure mental care facilities. That works, or at least it would if our laws weren’t a complete joke.
What a ridiculously simplistic view of a highly complex and definitely gendered problem.
Must be effective to unnerve you so.