The Duchess of Cambridge is dangerous.
Did you know?
Lock your doors, people. Be alert not alarmed. The Duchess is out to brainwash little girls into becoming grown up doormats with a single digit BMI (but with truly awesome hair).
At least that’s what writer Maggie Hamilton seems to think. (Okay maybe not the awesome hair bit… I made that up).
Usually I consider myself to be a fairly reasonable person. I work hard to see both sides to most arguments. And I can understand (most of the time) where people are coming from even if I don’t agree with them.
But today, I just can’t do that.
I have sat for the past week and gritted my teeth as a critical post about the Duchess of Cambridge has gone viral on Mamamia.
A post by Maggie Hamilton claiming that the Duchess of Cambridge is, in fact, a threat to our daughters.
A threat? What kind of threat? On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being a Bratz doll and 10 being Dating Harry Styles… where does the DoC sit? Somewhere between airbrushing and the thigh gap trend?)
For those playing along at home, here’s a snapshot of what Maggie had to say in her piece (in the event you are one of the five people in this country who has yet to read it):
I have nothing against Kate. I am sure that she is nice, that she is a good wife, a good daughter, a good person, and of course, a great mother. But I do have a problem with her being held up as an ideal of exemplary womanhood, a wonderful role model for our daughters, an antidote to the Kim Kardashians of the world.
Then there was this bit:
Top Comments
I think the problem with touting Kate as a role model is that prior to her joining the Royal family, she didn't actually do very much at all. Working for her parents and their online party business was hardly setting the world on fire and did seem to be an easy option. Why do we have to have famous people as role models at all? How about people that are closer to home that your children actually know? My vet and my GP are both women and would serve as much better examples of good role models, than anyone in the public eye, who can only really be judged by what the media sells about them.
I must say some people are very passionate about this topic!
I personally quite enjoyed seeing the photos of the royal visit and little George (so cute). But really, why all the judgement of a woman who is just making personal choices like we all do every day of our lives? Yes she chose to marry a rich Prince and take on the role of a royal... well I say good for her. So she chooses not to work as much as other royals, again good for her. If that is her decision then great. If she chooses to wear a certain dress, be a certain size or act a certain way, even if it is performing a role, then good for her. Again it's her choice. Not all women can be brain surgeons and scientists and politicians and not all of them want to be. She has the means and opportunity to live life as a royal and work in a part time fashion - again good for her! If I could do that, I would probably choose that lifestyle too! We need to stop judging woman on their choices and start supporting them instead. And if I have a daughter and she chooses to have the DOC as a role model, we can sit down and discuss why she thinks of her that way. If she admires her for her charity work, great I hope my daughter would be involved in charity work too; if she likes her for her role as a mother that's great with me too; and if she just likes her for her hair, well then I would say how true. She does have lovely hair!