When Kate Langbroek was cast on a new prime-time talk show called The Panel back in 1998, she’d never ‘done’ television before. She’d had small acting roles, including on the soap Chances and in a Transport Accident Commission Community Service Announcement, and had built a profile as a host on independent Melbourne radio station Triple R.
But this was different.
Speaking to Sarah Grynberg on PodcastOne’s A Life of Greatness, the now-stalwart media personality revealed the early days of the weekly Channel 10 current affairs show were a maelstrom of insecurity and negative feedback from viewers.
Because the program came via Working Dog Productions, which had close ties with more-established talent, Langbroek said many questioned her casting.
“People were expecting that it would be Jane Kennedy or Jude [Judith Lucy], and when it was me they were like, ‘Who the f*** is that?’… That is basically the letters that I got,” she told the podcast.
“Also, I was really bad, because I’d never done TV before. I was a bit overwhelmed that, suddenly, there I was with these people who were amazing and seemed to know a lot of stuff. If I didn’t know something, I would go, ‘What does that mean?’ And [viewers] would go, ‘You know nothing!’ [in letters].
Top Comments
Kate was brilliant on the panel. So funny! And when she breastfed on the panel, what a legend!! Love her.
On the whole I didn't mind her, but even today I do remember how annoying it was how she'd interject and ask "why?" "what's that?" like a work experience kid - clearly she didn't have a clue what was going on a lot of the time (so it's interesting to see it confirmed that was indeed the case!). The professional thing to do is to fake it and ask for direction off camera, rather than have airtime used to explain stuff to the paid entertainer.
Personally, I think her asking all those questions was great. Some called her dumb, but this was amongst a panel of seasoned and highly intelligent minds. Her questions helped the lay person keep up on such important topics that ordinarily they might tune out from or ignore. She bridged a gap.
The Working Dog crew had her there for a reason, she wasn’t dumb, she was simply showing us that we should open our minds to learning more about the world. Even more importantly, she showed us that it’s ok to not know everything and not to shy away from asking questions if you don’t know everything. She was real and genuine, and quite frankly, I’m disappointed to hear that people sucked enough to say such nasty things about her. Good on the Working Dog people for sticking with her and knowing her true worth.
I disagree, if she didn't know then probably a lot of the viewing audience didn't know either and I would say she was representing those people and asking the dumb questions that a lot of people are too scared or proud to ask
It would have been much better if the most unprofessional, unpolished and uninformed regular member of The Panel wasn't also their sole female member. It would have been preferable to have the "amateur role" played by one of the many blokes, rather than relegating their only female representative to that part.