Is this enough?
We’ve got a new hero this week. A King.
A knock-about kinda guy who is so humble he skipped a traditional drinking session after his big win and instead went on “Daddy Duty”, according to the tabloids.
A man whose first act when he won the prize of his life was to embrace his partner and child.
A good man, indeed. But what does it say about us that a man who shows love and respect to a woman is such a celebrated oddity?
The hero I am referring to is Johnathan Thurston, the dynamic player who made Sunday night’s NRL Grand Final one of the most exciting ever.
The 32-year old whose photo of him and his gorgeous daughter clutching a toy doll instantly went viral.
A great bloke. The King of the North.
Let me firstly state there is no doubt Johnathan Thurston is a great role model for young footballers and indigenous youths.
There is no doubt he displays good sportsmanship in a time when so few do. There is no doubt he will go on to be one of the greatest players the sport has seen.
There is no doubt he’s a great father, has two delightful little girls and appears to be a loving and devoted husband.
But seriously, isn’t that what we should expect from a man? Really? That he loves his children and treats his partner well?
Is the bar so low in our male role models that completely ordinary behaviour seems worthy of extra special adulation?
“He’s the kind of guy we want our sons to grow up to be,” is what everyone is saying on daytime radio today.
Top Comments
There aren't any. The football culture is messed up so we cheer anyone who doesn't participate. The truth is that a lot of the greats have rape scandals in their past. This guy is not about that life because he's normal.
Extremely flawed logic in the title "Why is a footballer hailed as a hero, just for acting like a decent human being?
The title states that he is hailed a hero JUST for being a decent human. But that is what a hero is!
A hero, by the very nature of the word, is being a decent human. That's the nature of being a hero.
Definition from Google; a person, typically a man, who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.
Those which are described as heroes, are called so because they are decent human beings. And regardless of what the particular "hero" has achieved - it is fundamentally through the act of being a decent human, by which they are recognised as a hero!
So please tell me, if being a good (or "decent") human isn't the prerequisite for being a hero, what is?
Well said!!