After Johanna Konta lost to unseeded Barbora Strycova in the Wimbledon quarterfinals, a male reporter told the professional tennis player she “could have done better”.
The reporter proceeded to list off statistics concerning her unforced errors in the match, before suggesting to the British tennis player that she should focus on her own mistakes, rather than crediting her opponent’s performance.
The Sydney-born and former Australian tennis player did not hesitate to defend herself against the male reporter’s “disrespectful” remarks.
It was not just the initial question that caused tension, but also the journalist’s insistence to pursue the question after Konta demonstrated she was uncomfortable.
The full exchange went as follows:
Reporter: Looking at numbers, 33 unforced errors, then you had a smash at the net which you hit straight to her, then towards the end of the third set you had a double-fault, then missed a drive volley. Do you not have to look at yourself a little bit about how you cope with these big points? It’s all very well saying it’s a lot to do with your opponent, but there were key points when you perhaps could have done better.
Johanna Konta: Is that in your professional tennis opinion?
Reporter: No, that’s just as a watching spectator with everyone else on Centre Court willing you on. And the numbers are IBM’s.
Johanna Konta: OK. I mean, I don’t think you need to pick on me in a harsh way. I mean, I think I’m very open with you guys. I say how I feel out there. If you don’t want to accept that answer or you don’t agree with it, that’s fine. I still believe in the tennis that I play. I still believe in the way I competed. Yeah, I don’t have much else to say to your question.
Top Comments
Thank goodness all the mamamen trolls are here to tell her why she is wrong.
I don't think facts are gendered.
I agree - rando malius trollius expungius is the go to spell here, the thread needs to be cleared, expunged, exiled and expired of these malcontents.
Maybe I've watched too many Harry Potter films. ;o)
She lost because Patriarchy. Her opponent won because Girls Can Do Anything.
Lol, well played.
If you got that from the article, you didn't read it properly.
Not really, it just shows a lack of reading comprehension.
I've learnt to read between the lies.