By political reporters Eliza Borrello and Matthew Doran
West Australian Labor Senator Joe Bullock has announced he is quitting politics over his party’s position on same-sex marriage.
Senator Bullock has been a right-faction powerbroker in the WA Labor Party and entered the Senate in 2014.
He made the announcement in the Senate on Tuesday night, saying he had long been against same-sex marriage and could not remain a Labor parliamentarian, given that the party will remove its members’ ability to vote with their conscience on the issue in 2019.
“Instinctively I know if your job requires you to do [that] which you believe to be wrong, there’s only one course of action: resign,” he said.
“As a member of the party, I’m free to disagree with the party policy, to lobby for change, and to encourage people to join the party with a view to achieving that end.”
However, he said, as a member of the parliamentary Labor Party, he had different obligations.
“As a Labor Senator, it’s my job to tell voters that it doesn’t matter that Labor will outlaw the conscience vote on homosexual marriage, and to recommend a vote for Labor without reservation.
“That’s the job description of a Labor Senator. It’s a job which I can’t do.”
Former WA senator Louise Pratt, pushed down the ALP ticket by Senator Bullock at the last election and not re-elected, will seek preselection to replace him.
Senator at odds with party over Safe Schools
Senator Bullock has loomed large in WA politics for many years.
Before entering politics he commanded significant power within the right faction of the WA branch of the Labor Party through various leadership roles within the right faction-aligned Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association.
Top Comments
Interesting timing. The removal of the conscience vote is not until the 2019 election, not this one. Was that the only reason?
Good to see the back of him. Why the right faction continues to try to eliminate people like Melissa Parke, Linda Kirk, Lisa Singh (and almost, Penny Wong for Don Farrel) and Louise Pratt for aging ideologically blinkered religious soc con hacks dismays me because it only can only be bad for democracy if an opposition doesn't oppose on a relevant, rational basis.