We’ve rounded up all the news you need to know today — so you don’t have to go searching.
1. Tributes flow in for Jody Meyers.
The body of South Australian mother Jody Meyers has been found under a concrete slab in the backyard of her partner’s parents.
Her partner, Neil Archer, has been charged with her murder.
The 20-year-old woman’s family and friends have paid tribute in a series of online posts.
“My mum lost a daughter, and I lost a sister, my kids lost their aunty and (your child) lost (their) mummy. We will forever miss her,”Ms Meyers’ sister Tania Parsons wrote on Facebook yesterday, The Advertiser reports.
Police allege Ms Meyers’ death was a result of domestic violence, and that she was killed on 26 August, the same night she disappeared.
Ms Meyers had a two-year-old son.
2. New UN global goals launched.
The United Nations has launched its new global goals, a series of targets to end poverty and tackle climate change.
The goals — also known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) –replace the Millennium Development Goals, which were set in 2000.
The 17 new goals, which have 169 specific targets, apply to all countries. They cover a wide-raging agenda, from fighting gender inequality responding to climate change and ensuring quality education.
While Australia has committed to the new goals, some humanitarian aid agencies warn that progress will be limited without increased commitment from leaders across political, private and development sectors.
Top Comments
1. Please can you change this to say ex-partner of Jody Meyers? He doesn't deserve the title partner, and it is highly likely to be inaccurate given she'd texted her family to announce she was leaving him. It's pretty apparent that she was killed by him for ending the relationship.
2. While the UN continues to be part of the problem it should have its funding removed (apart from that required to run its refugee camps). How much money do the UN pay themselves and why are they not held to account for only taking a reactionary roll in the face of millions of people being displaced and death toll exceeding 200,000?.
Ive never worked for the UN or any of its agencies, but I've worked alongside them on projects for many years. While they are not without their faults (bureaucratic madness to say the least), the role of the UN is not one of an international army. They excel in international policy development, facilitating cooperation between nations and setting realistic targets for LDCs and DCs. They can only advise nations, not force nations to do anything.
It is not outside the scope of the UN to use force if necessary to bring peace to a region and its non combatants, in this region the UN has failed to excel in any aspect of its work, this has been very clear for an extraordinary length of time, the UN's unwillingness to engage in the more forceful methods available to them makes them complicit in the resulting carnage. You may find that a harsh judgment, but they have always had the authority and the ability to act, just not the will, the result of that lack of will is plain for all to see.
Are we still talking about the Sustainable Development Goals? I've had first-hand experience at trying to help nations meet their UN Millennium Development Goals, and they are not at all related to forceful, combative methods, and are certainly not carnage related. Think potable drinking water, maternal health, poverty reduction, education and environmental sustainability. These are government policy related and typically performed by the UNDP, UNICEF, UNEP and other actors . I'm not sure which component of the UN you are talking about?
Exactly, ingoz. Not to mention that a huge portion of the UN and its tribunals are unpaid interns. The UN doesn't need to be 'punished' just because it isn't flawless.
And Anon, as soon as the UN uses force, it legally makes the area a legitimate target of war or retaliation. It's not an army. You don't really seem to understand it's function.