Joan Rivers’ autopsy inconclusive
An autopsy has failed to determine the cause of Joan Rivers’ death.
A spokesperson for the New York Medical Examiner’s Office has said the “cause and manner of death are pending further studies”.
The autopsy was part of the investigations into Yorkville Endoscopy, where the 81-year-old comedian and television host suffered a heart attack while receiving throat surgery.
Rivers died a week after the incident at Mount Sinai Hospital, where she had been placed into a medically induced coma.
Girl, 9, who shot instructor with Uzi lived in Sydney until last year
The 9-year-old girl who tragically killed an instructor at a shooting range in Arizona attended a Sydney primary school until last year, the Daily Mail reports.
It is understood that the girl was born in Australia, before she and her father, an investment banker, her mother, and two older siblings returned to the US this year. Her mother is believed to be an Australian citizen.
The family lived in the Sydney suburb of Mosman, and the girl attended the local primary school.
Their lawyer said the family was ‘devastated’ in a statement released shortly after the incident was reported. No further comment has been made after the identity of the family was revealed.
Secret recordings from the apartment of alleged Tinder murderer revealed
Secret recordings from the final hours of Warriena Wright’s life have been released by Queensland police, News Limited reports.
The recordings allegedly depict Gable Tostee – the man charged with her murder, who Wright met for a ‘Tinder’ date shortly before she died – verbally abusing her, calling her a “psycho little bitch” and threatening to throw her off the balcony.
Top Comments
Deer oh deer!
Seriously, the husband is defending his wife after she sent a male adult explicit pictures of their daughters!? I just cannot fathom this. How can he condone child porn, and of his own children!? I don't care who sent the pictures or for what lame reason, it's a crime and revolting behaviour to boot!!!
Yeah, I know. It beggars belief, doesn't it? I like the part where the father said the girls were 'suffering tremendously" without their mother. I would think they 'suffered even more tremendously' when she was around, posing them and then taking nude photographs of them, poor little mites. As for being 'under the influence of an evil person' I think we know EXACTLY who the evil person is in this little scenario. And shame on the husband, shame on him!
I am with you Guest, forgiveness is one thing but a person should only get one chance to prove they wouldn't send child porn to paedophiles if you know what I mean. She has used up that chance and that is it. This man needs to stand up for his children, if both parents are spineless about protecting their kids what hope is there for them?
And the other thing I think is crap is the 'I had no control over my wife and daughters.' Whaaaat? I understand if his excuse is that he had no idea what was going on and trusted his wife, but does this mean he thought there was something weird going on and didn't feel like he could do anything about it? I don't get it.
I think hes in shock and desperately wants to get back to normal. When my now exhusband was convicted of major fraud, I was convinced he was innocent even though there was a mountain of evidence against him and he pled guilty. I just wanted everything to go back to the way it was before I found out what a lying manipulating scumbag he was. I even asked the prosecuter to delay his sentancing trial for a few years until my kids were older. Thats the kind of denial I was in. And it sounds like this husband is too. When reality finally sinks in he is going to hate her trust me on that.
This is really interesting. I have often wondered about the spouses of the guilty and how they can 'stand by their man', so to speak. Thanks for the insight.