By MIA FREEDMAN
Hello, I have it all. Nice to meet you.
Said nobody ever.
After decades of hearing the tedious phrase ‘having it all’ used to frame debates about women’s lives, I’ve had a gutful. Hush now. It’s enough. Can we please consign this phrase to the circular file marked Dumb, Lazy, Meaningless Cliches That Have No Bearing On Actual Life.
Because it’s rubbish and it belongs in the bin.
If anyone has Isla Fisher’s mobile number could they please send her a text to this effect? Because here’s what the 37-year-old actress just said in an interview with Gotham magazine about the break she took from acting to look after her two daughters, Olive (5) and Elula (2).
‘I took three years off. It’s not like you’re taking a break and looking on IMDbPro to see your StarMeter falling. You’re doing the most important, incredible thing. When you come back in, the perspective has changed. I truly believe you can’t have it all and you shouldn’t want to.’
Here are the 3 reasons I hate it:
1. Nobody ever writes angsty articles about men ‘having it all’. That phrase is NEVER used about blokes. Men just have jobs and kids. Or they don’t. The end.
2. ‘Having It All’ is shorthand for ‘Having Kids & A Career’. Which explicitly suggests the only way a woman can be truly happy and complete is to have both. It also presupposes all women want to have both. Or should have both. Not true.
3. ‘Having It All’ sounds unmistakably greedy. Like Veruca Salt or – worse – Augustus Gloop from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Why should the choices we make in our lives be couched in terms of being greedy?
Top Comments
How many men are the primary care giver for their child/ren? And of those men, how many have sacrificed their own career progression to support their wives? While the number is smaller, those men are in exactly the same position as most women.
I'm 24 and don't have any children (bad opener?) but want to say that I don't believe Isla's comment to be particularly bad.
I think all she's saying is something along the lines of, "I chose to have children so I chose to stay at home with them, because of that my career came second." what's wrong with that?
I'm of the belief that women are the ones at the centre of "having it all" debates because we're the ones who have the babies - we have to take at least a little bit of time off work. So of course debates around what is right, and what it means to be a woman in a few different roles will occur.
Perhaps that is naive, but at this point in time, I don't feel a strong hatred towards that concept. I believe in, like Isla's has done, choosing whats right for you, and what's right for your children, should you decide to have them.