When Samantha Blakely discovered she was pregnant after being raped by her coworker at 23, she stood in the shower and screamed her lungs out.
Immediately, she knew she only had one choice.
The now 25-year-old, who resides in the conservative southern US state of Alabama, googled her options. She looked at dangerous pills, natural remedies and even a tea from China that could reportedly induce labor – she’d do just about anything to stop her rapist’s child coming into the world.
Finally, after three frantic days of searching, Samantha learned that there was an abortion clinic close to her in Montgomery. Following several days off work, hours spent sitting in crowded waiting rooms, a session of mandatory counselling and a $600 lump sum, Samantha had an abortion. Her nightmare was finally over.
On SBS’s Dateline, Walkley award-winning journalist Laura Murphy-Oates reports from Alabama to investigate the divisive new laws. Post continues after video.
If Samantha’s situation happened today, however, her story would have been very different.
Under Alabama’s tough new abortion laws, Samantha Blakely would have been forced to carry her rapist’s child.
Speaking to the 25-year-old on tonight’s episode of Dateline, Walkley award-winning journalist Laura Murphy-Oates discovered that it was a situation that Samantha simply would not have been able to bear.
Top Comments
It's important not to buy in to the language used by particular campaigns, thereby legitimising they way they describe themselves. In this case, don't use "pro-life". The more appropriate term is "anti-abortion".
No, the more appropriate term is anti-choice.
And what’s the legitimate term for, “pro-choice”? The more appropriate term is, “anti-?”.
We need to stop referring to these opponents as "Pro-life", they are for Forced Birth. If they were really pro-life they would campaign for better sex education in schools, cheaper and better access to contraception and universal Maternity and Paternity leave.