Keeping up to date with who is saying what to whom, in the Middle East, gets very confusing. It can be like watching an episode of the Kardashian’s and not knowing which sister started the fight.
Picking a side can be tricky if you don’t have the full story. Just ask Kayne.
Okay we’ve tortured that metaphor enough now and obviously, this is just a smidge more worthy of your brain space than Kim’s extended family. A smidge.
Today we’re talking about Iran. A nation that has been in the news a lot lately, particularly around their nuclear program an an international agreement about its future. So, let’s bring everyone up to speed.
Why is Iran in the news at the moment?
Early this week the international community welcomed the successful conclusion of meetings held in Geneva between Iran and the six-world powers- US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany. The purpose of these meetings was to achieve some sort of agreement in regards to Iran’s uranium enrichment program.
Iran is regularly the focus of condemnation for this program. America and Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of attempting to build themselves a nuclear bomb. If this is true, Iran would be in breach of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is the big global agreement that says we aren’t going to use nuclear to blow each other up. Iran is signed up to the treaty.
This treaty does allow Iran to do some nuclear research. But it has to be for peaceful purposes, for example exploring options for nuclear-powered electricity. Iran claims this is all that they are doing, but the international community is pretty suspicious. The fear is that nuclear weapons could be used against neighbours it has long-standing tensions with, like Israel or Saudi Arabia.
Top Comments
I can see that this discussion is going to take the following tone: Iran, good. USA, bad. The use of the atomic bomb by the Americans ended World War Two and it is easy to call them war criminals 68 years later whilst sitting in the safety of your home. Maybe Australia can benefit and we sell them the uranium for their 'electricity production'.
Pop Quiz, name the only country to ever use nuclear weapons as an act of terror in a manner that is illegal (targetting civilians is now against Geneva Convention and back then I believe it constituted a warcrime).
The trouble with only a few countries allowed to have nukes is that they get a disproportionate level of protection via M.A.D. Countries are far more reluctant to invade a country that has WMD's of such devastating capability.
Yes it's easy to dismiss the US as war criminals isn't it? Are you forgetting the whole reason for being at war with Japan was because they were invading every country in the western pacific and enslaving the people? You're ignoring the way the Japanese were treating POW's too. You want to discuss war crimes? Go for it.
You do not get to commit warcrimes because others commit warcrimes. Japan did horrible stuff such as unit 731, they too are bad but using WMD's on a civilian population is inexcusable. These are major weapons so powerful that the LIGHT alone would set people on fire, the pressure blew eyeballs out of their sockets and it was the least precise weapon in history with such an overkill range that really it never had a decent use apart from sheer terror and destruction. Most cyclones are more humane.
Guess what? The atomic bombs ended the war. It's a sad fact that since the end of WW1 every conflict has caused the deaths of more civilians than soldiers.
If I was in Truman's shoes I would have used them too, and slept like a baby that night.
I think the only person referring to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a 'war crime' is you and the other anti American lefties. The Allies firebombed Dresden and Cologne causing large numbers of civilian deaths. The Germans bombed London, killing thousands of civilians. The Japanese starved, murdered and raped hundreds of civilian women in their internment camps especially in Sumatra. The Russians raped over 2,000,000 women in the countries they overtook in the last days of World War Two. The bombings were terrible, but justified as they ended the war and saved thousands of young Allied soldiers' lives. Maybe the Japanese Govt should have been held more responsible for the deaths of its citizens since it refused to surrender after the first bomb was dropped.