You’ve seen them around.
Frazzled mothers (usually, or nannies) ferrying kids between violin and swimming and Mandarin (it’s the language of the future, people). You know some parents do their child’s homework. Some parents make play-dates for 13-year-olds. You’ve seen little faces on a sunny Thursday afternoon at the school gate turn from joyful to stressed when they remember they have piano practice this afternoon.
You’ve thought “why doesn’t she just let him be, he’s just not that kind of kid, let him play”. You’ve thought, ‘Am I like her?’. You know children are on medication, you know mums are too. You know everybody seems stressed and anxious.
Julie Lythcott-Haims, the former Stanford Dean of Freshman students says we all know that something is not right with modern parenting – particularly in affluent socio-economic groups.
“Do you really need me to say any of this to you?” says Lythcott-Haims, who spent 10 years ushering first-year students into prestigious Stanford University in the U.S.
“You know it. We all know it. We hear about 20 somethings and 30 somethings failing to launch. We see our children withering under the pressure of the check-listed childhood. We remember our own freer childhoods lived not that long ago. This overly protected, overly directed, overly hand-holding way of parenting is harmful to all.”
She said this way of parenting makes children “brittle and old”.
When she was the Dean of Freshman students at Stanford Lythcott-Haims was on the look-out for the first years arriving on campus from the “margins” the who had “harder family narratives” believing they would be the ones needing her guidance and support the most.
“Imagine how surprised I was to discover among my more affluent, well-connected students – each year a growing number – who seemed to lack the ability to make their way independently in the world as, frankly, 18-22 year-olds used to be able to do and, most crucially, desired to do. Something was odd and it took most of my ten years [at Stanford] to work it out.”