The world was shocked earlier this week to see photos of a four-year-old boy in the backseat of an SUV, with two adults passed out in the front.
The photos were taken by police in East Liverpool, Ohio, after an officer noticed the car driving erratically and then drifting to a stop.
The couple in the front, who had injected heroin, were identified as Rhonda Pasek and James Acord.
Now the full story behind the images has emerged.
Pasek and Acord are not the boy’s parents. Pasek is the boy’s grandmother. She was granted custody of him just six weeks earlier.
The boy’s mother is Reva McCullough. The Daily Mail tracked her down, reporting she was “a stripper who admits she smoked crack”.
McCullough was distressed to see the photos of her son.
“I bawled for four days straight,” she said. “I want my boy back.”
The boy with his grandmother and her boyfriend. Image via Facebook/City of East Liverpool, Ohio.
The little boy has been the subject of custody battles almost from the time he was born.
McCullough's grandparents, Dick and Barbara McCullough, told a court their granddaughter was using drugs, specifically crack.
They claimed the boy's father, Devon Pasek, was involved in narcotics trafficking, although he's never been charged. They won full custody of the baby, despite being in their eighties.
But as they got older, the McCulloughs found they weren't physically capable of looking after their great-grandchild. They wanted their daughter and her husband, Lori and Terry Lane, to take him, but Rhonda Pasek fought for custody, and eventually won.
After Pasek was arrested, following the SUV incident, a judge ordered the boy should live with a 60-year-old neighbour, Gene Kuhn.
Kuhn immediately bought him two pairs of shoes and a puppy, and enrolled him in school. But the boy had just a couple of days with Kuhn before being taken to live with the Lanes, who have now been granted custody of him.
Top Comments
If you 'could do without the breathless reporting' why do you write all the details about her stripping down?
Whenever I see this I just think rather than standing around taking pictures why aren't they getting the poor child out of the car and away from the situation?!? I also don't think that by releasing such photos they considered the child at all. These pics are going to be a part of his life forever now rather than some evidence photos he'll never have the misfortune of seeing. Way to further traumatize an already traumatized kid.
Oh good not just me thinking this
I disagree only because I think we need to raise awareness. In my opinion illicit drug use is a health issue and should be dealt with as such. However when said drug use is directly linked to the neglect and possible abuse of a child, it becomes a criminal issue. One of the biggest motivators to stop using a drug like heroin is to see how it can affect those you love, especially your children or grandchildren in this case. It is a confronting image, but I think people need to see what drug abuse does to the children of addicts. It only takes a moment to take a photo, I am sure that poor little boy was removed immediately after. Images are powerful, it was photos of traumatised children in Vietnam that turned the tide of public opinion with regard to that war.
Sorry for the rant, I only just realised how long my post was.
Considering the drug history of almost everyone involved here, I'm going out on a limb to say this is not the first time he has seen or experienced this sort of thing and the trauma happened long ago. Police and paramedics on hand spending two minutes taking photos for evidence is probably the least trauma this poor bugger has experienced for some time.
I do agree that the names and images of those involved should have been blurred or blocked though.