Mr Watt sat silently as his colleagues applauded the family violence campaigner.
A Victorian Liberal MP who remained seated during a standing ovation for Rosie Batty has defended his actions.
38-year old Graham Watt was in a special joint sitting of parliament with his colleagues when he failed to stand to applaud Australian of the Year Rosie Batty yesterday.
Ms Batty, whose son Luke was killed by his father Greg Anderson likened the domestic violence to family terrorism in her speech.
As she finished every member of the chamber got to their feet except Mr Watt who remained in his seat.
After the event Mr Watt released a statement, saying that: “For very personal and private reasons I chose not to stand”.
“Family violence is an issue of incredible sensitivity to me and my family and at some point I will be making a public contribution about the indiscriminate nature of family violence,” he said.
“I am very passionate about dealing with the scourge of family violence and supporting all those who are victims of it, male and female.”
The Victorian Oppositon Leader Matthew Guy has defended his actions, saying that they did not reflect a lack of support to combat family violence.
“I think it’s fair to say that he has his own experiences and perspectives that are deeply personal and would be difficult for most of us to comprehend or to have understood because we haven’t been through them,” Mr Guy told 774 ABC Melbourne.
Top Comments
I love how everyone hates on MRAs for supposedly exaggerating violence against men. The thing is even if we accept feminist figures men's services are still massively underfunded and underresourced. Assuming 90% of domestic abuse is man on woman then services for battered men would get 10% of the money right? But they don't and feminists make sure they don't.
Not this debate again! Thank god I no longer live in your electorate Graham, there's no way I'd vote for you given your behaviour and weak excuse. This reminds me of when MPs left the parliamentary chamber during the apology to the Aboriginal community. This tendency of cherry-picking statistics to support one's position is the reason why so many vital issues do not get the intervention required despite the OVERWHELMING evidence base (DV, climate change, immunisations etc). No one is denying that there are male victims of DV. But we need to accept that the overwhelming amount are female and they are not getting the support to leave.
Of course what you write is true and it's really that simple, but MRA's don't care about the facts and manipulate stats for only one reason and that's that they hate women. They do this with all topics that revolve around women.
Anyone that likes a comment by an abvious MRA also hates women deep down and that includes lots of women unfortunately. Honestly don't understand it.
'the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another' - one definition of racism.
I suggest you read that definition and your comment together and see if you can find and similarities