A true crime story stranger than fiction.
Warning: This post deals with sexual assault and may be triggering for some readers.
UPDATE:
Gayle Newland, 25, has been convicted of impersonating a man to persuade her female friend into sex.
The jury convicted the defendant of three counts of sexual assault but cleared her of two other counts of sexual assault.
The UK Telegraph reports that Newland — from Cheshire in the UK — was found guilty of committing sexual assaults at the victim’s apartment. She was found not guilty of other acts alleged to have taken place at hotels in Chester.
Judge Roger Dutton told the court Newland had “serious issues surrounding her personality”.
He added: “Sentencing guidelines are quite clear that imprisonment is inevitable but I need a good deal of further examination before I take that further step.”
Newland now awaits sentencing.
Previously, Mamamia wrote:
Laura* had been dating Kye Fortune for two years when she learned a bizarre truth about him: He didn’t exist.
Instead, the person Laura had been having sex with was allegedly her female friend, 25-year-old Gayle Newland, in disguise.
That’s the story that Chester Crown Court in the UK has heard this week — and the details are so shocking, they’re making headlines internationally.
According to the UK Telegraph, Laura first met “Kye” via in 2011 Facebook, where his profile picture showed a half-Filipino, half-Latino man.
Top Comments
I'm the US and 15 years ago I was a victim of what is now called "catfishing." People do stupid things, especially when emotions are involved, and we have no right, nor are we in any position to judge them on the WHY of their decisions. Unless, of course, those decisions were illegal and they are now being judged (and even then only if you are on the jury do you really have any "right" to involve your thoughts).
Stupidity isn't consent. Making a bad decision in regard to relationships isn't consent. Regardless of the reasons behind her actions in the relationship, the person she thought she was in a relationship with, never existed. It was a character, a persona, a fake, created by someone else. Whether she chose to wear a blindfold, to only sleep with the person with the lights off, or an equal CHOICE in her relationship doesn't matter.
She thought she was making love to person A when it was actually person B because person A didn't actually exist. This isn't someone lying about a gender change, their history, marital situation, or possible STD status. This is about someone who used fraud, lies, and deceit to trick someone into sleeping with them thus removing the chance for informed and complete consent from the other individual.
No one deserves to be violated, to be broken, to have their reality destroyed in such a devastating fashion, regardless of how ignorant, or stupid they may be, and no matter how unrealistic that now destroyed "reality" was.
Your opinion on this situation will be based, most likely, on your views on the purposes of laws and what actions people should and shouldn't be held accountable for. This woman will spend years, if not decades, fully recovering from this entire ordeal and while it may help her grow as an individual in the end she in no way DESERVED it nor is she to blame.
People are so awful, glad to see such an intelligent comment :)
I honestly can't believe that a woman can be stupid enough to meet someone in a hotel room totally blindfolded & then continue to do so for months!! Seriously, did no warning bells go off that this is a wacko? Everyone on here is writing about consent & I'm just here scratching my head. Did she not feel that it was not a real penis? Didn't they have oral sex? Sounds completely fishy to me!
Yeah, so fishy that the perpetrator has now been convicted of RAPE among other things. Yet you're focusing on and vilifying the poor victim and not the predator?!
Also, not everyone has oral sex so why is that even a relevant question?