The world’s economies need cash, fast
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) says it needs about $1 trillion in order to stave off a worldwide recession the likes of the big one in the 1930s. IMF chief, Christine Lagarde, told an audience in Berlin $1 trillion would be needed to support ailing governments and stave off a deeper crisis – half of which would have to come from Fund backers such as Australia. The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, backed Ms Lagarde, saying without “larger firewalls” to protect embattled European nations the global economy was at risk. The SMH reported: Ms Lagarde said the world was facing “a 1930s moment, in which inaction, insularity and rigid ideology combine to cause a collapse in global demand. This is a defining moment,” she said. “It is not about saving any one country or region. It is about saving the world from a downward economic spiral.”
Fly the Aussie flag on your car … means you’re racist?
University of Western Australia sociologist and anthropologist Professor Farida Fozdar and a team of assistants surveyed 513 people at the Australia Day fireworks on Perth’s Swan River banks last Australia Day to test a possible link between flag flying on cars and racist thoughts. 102 of them had flags attached to their cars and almost half (43 per cent) agreed the White Australia policy was a good thing – ‘saving’ Australia from apparent multicultural troubles in Europe. A quarter who did not fly the flag agreed with the same statement, put to them by the researchers.
The survey also found that a total of 56 per cent of people with car flags feared for Australian culture and believed that the country’s most important values were in danger, compared with 34 per cent of non-flag flyers. Thirty-five per cent of flag flyers felt that people had to be born in Australia to be truly Australian, compared with 22 per cent of non-flag flyers. Twenty-three per cent of flag flyers believed that true Australians had to be Christian, while 18 per cent of non-flaggers agreed with the statement.
Top Comments
Like I said of yesterdays story on Charlie Teo lets give more air time to positive people who really are representative of the general community and not provide the red necks with further excuse to promote their racist views, this study is a crock of s**t and should be consigned to the bin where it belongs.
I actually agree with most of the answers given by the "racists". A term, which essentially seems to be applied here to describe anyone who dares to think their society and values are worth preserving and who recognise that unrestricted immigration will invariably threaten that.
In any other non-white country such an observation would be so obvious as to be trite.