Just after 11am on Wednesday morning, Cardinal George Pell was sentenced to six years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of three years and eight months.
Pell’s sentencing for sexually abusing two choirboys in 1996 was broadcast Australia-wide.
The maximum penalty for Pell’s crimes was 10 years, yet Chief Justice Peter Kidd said this was “not the diminutive factor of my sentence, nor is the maximum penalty the starting point for my sentencing exercise”.
Chief Judge Peter Kidd said Pell’s age – as a 77-year-old – was a factor in his sentencing.
“Of some real importance in my sentencing exercise is the fact that each year you spend in custody will represent a substantial portion of your remaining life expectancy,” he said.
“I am conscious that the term of imprisonment, which I am about to impose upon you, carries with it a real, as distinct from theoretical, possibility that you may not live to be released from prison.
“Facing jail at your age in these circumstances must be an awful state of affairs for you. You are also clearly someone with some significant enough health issues.
Listen to Mia Freedman, Holly Wainwright & Jessie Stephens unpack the Pell verdict on Mamamia Out Loud… Post continues after audio.
“I have no doubt that you will experience some stress while in custody. I will make allowance for these matters.”
The character references provided for Pell were also taken into account.
“In addition to not having any prior convictions, I am satisfied that the evidence before me is that you are someone who has been, in the last 22 years, since the offending, of otherwise good character.
Top Comments
I think the only way Pell would show any emotion would be if he was excommunicated from his beloved church. May his appeal fail and he continue to rot in jail.
“Otherwise good character”, really? ‘Yeah, he’s a great guy, if you ignore the paedophilia’. And frankly I wouldn’t be putting too much emphasis on the ‘no prior convictions’ part either. Does anyone actually think these two boys were the only ones he abused? (I know that possible crimes shouldn’t be considered during sentencing, I’m just saying maybe don’t emphasise that as part of your reasoning.)