-With AAP.
Abuse survivors gathered at Melbourne’s County Court this morning for the sentencing of disgraced Cardinal George Pell for abusing two teenage boys in 1996.
Among them was Michael Advocate, a man in a blue shirt who listened to the judge’s hour-long remarks with his head in his hands.
Chief Judge Peter Kidd sentenced Pell to six years in prison with a non-parole period of three years and eight months, three months after he was found guilty of orally raping a 13-year-old choirboy and molesting another at St Patrick’s Cathedral after a Sunday mass.
Listen to Mia Freedman, Holly Wainwright & Jessie Stephens unpack the Pell verdict on Mamamia Out Loud… Post continues after audio.
Advocate, a survivor of child sexual abuse and founder of Victim Group Actions, described the sentence as “pathetic”.
“[I’m] really disappointed,” he told 7 News from outside the court.
“It doesn’t send any deterrent at all. It doesn’t give the victims any sense of justice. You know, less than four years jail time for destroying the lives of two innocent young boys. Is their life only worth two years each?”
“May Pell rot in his cell… But what about appropriate respect for the victims? What about fair justice? … Six years? It’s pathetic.”
“It’s pathetic”: Abuse survivor Michael Advocate responds to the #pellsentence#cardinalpell #AusNews pic.twitter.com/7K4K6IPHcu
— 7News Yahoo7 (@Y7News) March 13, 2019
Top Comments
Our mostly male judges are and have always been, conspicuously lenient in sentencing for 'sex' crimes. Do we need more female judges, who would better see victims as children that needed protecting from men, rather than as people who provided men their entitlement to sexual gratification? Our society still tells men they are entitled to having their sexual needs met, hence the sexualisation of women in our media and in policy-making, and the proliferation of pedophilia due to inadequate prosecution and sentencing. Many men still believe it is their female partner's job to tend to their sexual needs. Hell, it has only been a decade or two since men were legally allowed to rape their wives.
Why wouldn't male judges be tainted with this same even subconscious bias, that child sex abuse perpetrators were only men just trying to get sex?
it was a woman judge that aquitted that laneway rapist wasnt it ? the that was on 4 corners
How would that sentence encourage other victims to come forward, it wouldn’t. Come forward and speak the truth have their lives pushed into the light and media, have hours of interviews going over details - how traumatic and for what? A lousy 3 years non parole period. No words. There are jo words. That is not justice.
Remember, the court can’t take into account stuff he hasn’t been charged with/found guilty of, and that a harsh sentence may be easily appealed.
My heart agrees with you, but it's a delicate legal dance and Chief Judge Kidd has done well.
the law is an ass