On Monday afternoon AEST, a frazzled but impassioned Frances McDormand put her Oscar on the floor of the Dolby theatre and, with arms outstretched and palms facing the roof, asked every female nominee to stand. Her voice got louder, her ams got higher, applause more frenzied. As the women stood, McDormand’s grin stretched to the end of either cheek.
It was a fitting end to an Awards season punctuated by talk of time being up, of an industry that needs to change, of how long men have been shrouded in the Hollywood light despite the shadows they cast on those in their wake.
McDormand became the face of the awards ceremony, her speech replayed and her face and her photo strewn across every major news site.
Curious, of course, for the fact just minutes before she accepted her award, Gary Oldman took the stage to accept his own for Best Actor.
Top Comments
When courts usually favour the mother in custody suits, there has to be a good reason why the father was given sole custody. And I don't think it's just his money and influence. The son is alluding to his mother having mental health issues, so maybe this is not as clear cut as some would like to think.
So despite recognising and saying:
"And herein lies the depths of grey regarding #MeToo. The movement has evolved quickly. We aren't judges, we aren't juries, but we want justice. We know believing women creates change, but believing all undoes a movement. We know that assuming guilt is dangerous, but staying silent appears complicit.
In the case of Gary Oldman, we're a little confused. We don't know which way to look, so we don't look at all. We don't know which way to turn, so we avoid him altogether."
the article still ends with;
"So for now, when we don't know where to stand or who to stand beside, we gravitate to the ones we can be sure of. The ones who stand on stage and pull women up with them. The ones who want, with raised fists, to lead the pack behind them."
So we should ignore someone who by almost all accounts has been falsely accused because it's uncomfortable to accept that some women's accusations are false or misleading? Wow... statements like that are what will, as you pointed out, undo the movement.
And why are we so "sure" of these people? Because they're women? Because their PR machine is slick and what we see in the media is favourable?