This post deals with child sex abuse and might be triggering for some readers.
The headmaster of a prestigious Melbourne Catholic boys’ school has resigned after it was revealed he gave a glowing reference to an athletic coach who groomed a Year 9 student.
In a letter to parents, St Kevin’s College headmaster Stephen Russell said he was resigning to prioritise the wellbeing of the school and its students.
“In my time at St Kevin’s I have always tried to put the school before self and the students’ wellbeing at the very top of my list of priorities,” he said in the letter obtained by the ABC.
Paris Street was groomed by an athletic coach at St Kevin’s College. Post continues below video.
“I believe the current situation means that the best way to achieve this is to resign.
“I extend my best wishes and encouragement to the current student body to be ‘good people’, the way so many who went before them have been across the decades.”
He thanked the school community for their support and added that his family’s “wellbeing and safety and long term happiness have also been factors in my decision.”
Top Comments
Weird deletion.
Weird moderator
says "What?"deletes this.Andrew Bolt has defended him and has gone after the reporter
There is a weird and disturbing clannishness amongst people on the (religious?) right that unsettingly extends to leaping to a vigorous defence of paedophiles. Bolt did the same for Pell and was joined in that by Abbott. Do they have an understanding of how unsettling this is to onlookers? Apologism for paedophilia. Does Bolt think that he's standing up for some sort of right to 'hit on' minors?
Deeply disturbing on more than a few levels - do the defenders not find these acts, inherently, morally repugnant? What kind of putrescent bubbles do they exist in, where this isn't starkly wrong?
Is it this kind of clannishness that caused the principal to give this reference? Even without the backdrop of the investigative broom sweeping through the Catholic Church around that time, it was an astonishing act to rationalise doing.
It’s the reaction of men who thought they could never be challenged on the word of another person. They’ve all been treating people atrociously for decades, and justifying it to themselves that ‘we all have to make hard choices to get things done’. When they see another white man of high status suddenly have to answer for his actions- and based on the account of someone they consider ‘lesser’ than them- they’re outraged that the immunity they thought they had has been challenged. If it can happen to X then it can happen to them- but they’re not a bar person really, so X can’t be either. It’s the world that’s gone mad, not their behaviour that is the issue.
Bolt is famously anti communism and socialism and the catholic Church has always been anti communism.