We’ve rounded up all the latest stories from Australia and around the world – so you don’t have to go searching.
1. Damning report calls for children in detention to be released.
A shocking report tabled in parliament last night has called for all children to be released from mainland detention and from the detention centre on Nauru.
“The Forgotten Children” report, prepared by the Australian Human Rights Commission inquiry, interviewed 1129 children over 15 months from January 2013 to March 2014.
The report by Gillian Triggs had devastating findings.
It has revealed that more than 300 children committed or threatened self-harm in a 15-month period in Australian immigration detention, 30 reported sexual assault, 30 went on hunger strike and more than 200 were involved in assaults.
The report found that “prolonged detention is having profoundly negative impacts on the mental and emotional health and development of children”.
Australia has 257 children in immigration detention of these 119 are on Nauru. Over the past two weeks 100 children were released into the Australian community.
The report points out that the number of children in detention has fallen from nearly 2000 in July 2013 to less than 200.
But even 200 is too many.
“At the time of writing this report, children and adults had been detained for over a year on average.”
It says children being detained indefinitely on Nauru are “suffering from extreme levels of physical, emotional, psychological and developmental distress”.
Top Comments
Children exposed to Tuberculosis at child care center...Why, is my question?
Some people with TB don't show symptoms or only have minor ones. Lots of people seem to think that it doesn't exist in the world but there are still areas with high prevalence. Hopefully the screening will catch anyone who is exposed early so they can get fast treatment.
Yes and also some parents send their kids to childcare even though they show signs of being sick
TB was eradicated in this country, but has resurged due to unvaccinated immigrants and refugees.
As for the woman saying she had an 'internal' exam in the galley, seriously? So there just happened to be a trained midwife or doctor on board who was happy tomgive her a vaginal examination on the floor of an aeroplane? Or was the purser doubling as a midwife that day.
I know here in Oz they practically eradicated it by being so strident in the early treatment but there is a few cases coming in now that we have bought in so many different peoples fleeing countries in turmoil
#9 why on earth is the murderer referred to as an atheist?? Atheist means you don't believe in any religion - why the eff is that relevant to the fact they killed someone?
#5 I hope whoever made the comment yesterday saying "If you threaten police with a knife you deserve to be shot" reads this....and doesn't have any autistic family members who might get killed by police.
I agree that it's a bizarre inclusion. They may as well say "a man who doesn't believe in any organised religions executed three Muslim members of a family over parking."
Is it to rule out a one-religion-vs-another-religion killing, or a quick dig at atheists? Otherwise it's about as relevant as saying: "man who doesn't eat sprouts executed three Muslims..." Or "man who doesn't own a budgie executed three Muslim members..."
I think they wanted to clarify that it probably wasnt a race motivated attack
Because this was clearly a hate crime. The murderer was known to hate religion, he describes himself on facebook as anti-theist and was known to insult all major religions. These poor young innocent lives were taken because they were muslim. If the killer was muslim and killed three atheist students the world would be outraged, im disappointed but not surprised at the lack of media coverage this has received. These students were executed. My heart goes out to their families. They had so much to offer the world. Here is an interview on cnn with one of the victim's sisters.
https://m.youtube.com/watch...
Cnn-Suzanne Barakat
I wonder why, when other methods used to try and defuse the situation with the knife-wielding young woman (the use of a taser and capsicum spray) failed, the officer who shot her didn't aim at her legs. Why was it necessary to shoot her in the chest? This policeman will have to live with the horror of this for the rest of his life. I can't help worrying that there isn't sufficient training in what body parts to aim for if they feel they have no option but to use their guns. We could say that in the heat of the moment it just happened, but that should also be part of training - how to keep a cool head in turbulent circumstances. A tragedy all round.