Whenever people assume that railing against the patriarchy means hating all men, they’re forgetting one major reality: the patriarchy hurts men, too.
We need look no further for evidence of this than the way high profile men with big jobs are somehow expected to ignore the fact that they have children in order to hold them.
While the crippling double-standard for working women has been famously captured by Annabel Crabbe's assertion that a working mother must "work as if one did not have children, while raising one's children as if one did not have a job," there is also the prevailing idea that in order to perform a high-stakes job, a man must be willing to ignore the fact that he has a family all together.
It's the product of toxic masculinity on a societal scale that we expect these men to simply tough it out for the greater good.
The greater good of whom, however, remains murky.
Sir Keir Starmer — a Labour politician who will most likely very soon be the UK’s next prime minister — has this week been attacked by politicians from the opposition for comments he made during a Virgin Radio interview about carving out sacred family time in the lead-up to the national election.
Starmer — who shares two teenage daughters with his wife, Victoria, told interviewer Chris Evans on Monday: "We’ve had a structure in place that I try to keep to, which is to carve out really protected time for the kids."
"So on a Friday — I’ve been doing this for years — I will not do a work-related thing after six o'clock, pretty well come what may."