I visit one of the world’s busiest porn sites. Pornhub has 2.4 million visitors per hour, almost 6,000 visitors per second.
On the homepage I see bondage. Group sex. Mutual orgasms. Nylon fetish. Public sex.
The only consistency in this smorgasbord of choice? No condoms. Anywhere.
That was set to change. Porn sex was set to become a lot safer. But it didn’t. A ballot proposition in California, USA, for the mandatory use of condoms by porn stars was rejected on Tuesday.
It was a step towards “ethical porn”. A move not only designed to enhance safety and sexual health in actors, but also to encourage safe sex in consumers. It was opposed because industry members saw it as “harmful to the industry”. The ballot’s final margin was 54-46 per cent.
It seems like a missed opportunity.
Porn is more accessible than ever before. Men and women can ‘get off’ in nine minutes (the average time an users spend on porn sites) and they can do this to any material they’re after, likely for free. Only a few mouse clicks are needed.
The options are more diverse… (I’m not venturing any deeper into Pornhub. You get the drift.)
And people are making the most of it. Data from the American Psychological Association shows rates of porn consumption range between 50 per cent and 99 per cent among men, and 30 per cent and 86 per cent among women.
That’s a lot of eyeballs that could have been watching safe porn. Ethical porn. Porn with condoms.
In the US, 2014 saw reported cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis rise to the highest levels since 2006. In Australia, STIs and blood-borne viruses also hit near-decade highs, and STIs in women aged 40-59 doubled between 2004 and 2010.
Top Comments
You only deleted that awesome conversation piece because you're still tetchy about me backing Bernie over Hillary.