By political reporter Francis Keany
Liberal senator Eric Abetz has been criticised by the race discrimination commissioner for using the term “negro” during a radio interview.
The Tasmanian senator was involved in a heated debate on Macquarie Radio in Sydney yesterday about same-sex marriage.
He was asked about reports bakeries were refusing to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples and whether it would be just as bad if the couple were Asian.
“Those sorts of analogies are quite offensive and that sort of analogy was completely debunked by Justice Clarence Thomas, the negro American on the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with this issue, who dissented on the issue of marriage as well,” Senator Abetz told Radio 2UE.
Justice Thomas is an African-American Justice of the US Supreme Court who criticised a decision to invalidate state-based same-sex marriage bans in June.
Race discrimination commissioner Tim Soutphommasane said it was “disappointing” that such language would be used in public debate.
“Most fair-minded people would recognise that ‘negro’ is an outdated term that is inappropriate and racially loaded,” he said.
Mr Soutphommasane said it was a racial slur, even if the senator was not meaning to insult Justice Thomas.
“This is the modern reality of racism,” he said.
“You can cause harm, even if you don’t intend to cause harm or even if you’re not motivated by malice.
Top Comments
Um, less than 20 years ago, negro was the politically correct term. The 'n eye gee gee ee are' word was offensive and racist. In Australian schools even in the late 90s we were taught that negro is the proper preferred term. So at schools we were taught that anything other than negro was offensive. NOW, the word that was hailed in cultural studies as the proper non-offensive word, is *now* offensive. Who can keep up? It is getting ridiculous. People from my generation will all be called racist now, I guess. And the teachers. There is more than enough to nail Abetz with breast cancer/abortion links, wanting to remove all penalty rates etc etc. But this, this is just ridiculous.
Perhaps a list should be published each year letting us know which terms/words are or are not deemed appropriate? Abetz seems like a bit of a git, but I really don't see why he should have to apologize for using the word negro, especially as he wasn't using it in an abusive or intentionally insulting manner.