I nipped into a boutique burger joint recently. I hadn’t eaten much that day, so the sums in my head added up happily to a strong “yes” vote on the question of a lunchtime treat.
I’d spent much of the morning interviewing a Holocaust survivor, would you believe, for my podcast The Nitty Gritty Committee. He’d tracked back through the years of degradation and starvation he’d suffered, telling the stories he’d told so many times before, stories we both worried had been told too many times, and somehow didn’t seem to startle as they once had.
I was very present, please don’t misunderstand me, but I was also sitting happily with the knowledge that I was going to satisfy my demon that day. Yes, as I listened to a man talk about his youthful hunger, about digging up a dead, diseased, concentration camp guard dog, and secretly eating it in the dark of night, knowing that discovering would mean his own death, I rocked gently with the anticipation of my overpriced lunch.
“Would I have chips?” (Of course!) “Which sauce would I have?” (The creamiest one!) Much softer, though still clearly audible, “why do you trust your numbers? Any reflective surface will tell you they don’t add up! You, madam, do not understand the numbers. You don’t understand anything.”
“Nope,” I refocus, “the numbers definitely add up today, I’ve been over them and over them, it’s absolutely OK for me to eat that hamburger and by Christ, I am eating it.” I drove the short distance from the Holocaust centre to the burger bar, euphoric.
I yanked my car into the parallel park out front in one fluid movement, like a Jedi through a waterslide. Once inside, I move with precision. There was no agonising consideration of the menu, I knew exactly what I was there for and was in no mood to dilly-dally. The numbers didn’t often add up this well on a day I happened to be in the vicinity of this hamburger. Who knew when the stars would align like this again, if ever? I wasn’t interested in playing coy.
Top Comments
Anorexia is not about an over abundance of virtuous traits. Eating disorders are serious and complex and not about willpower whether you are super thin or super over weight or "normal weight".
Meshel is right about people not wanting to be told by strangers IRL what others think they feel.
Research into anorexia in particular has come a way in the last year and the article may require a re jig.
i think that Meshel describing her personal thoughts towards people with anorexia is an admission that her own eating disorder had warped her perception of others that are suffering from the same, albeit different disorder. this is a confession of her misunderstanding and inability to see food in a rational way - her epiphany was feeling compassion for this girl, with the unspoken conclusion that it was not enviable and that the girl was suffering just as personally with her own demons. perhaps this was needed to be explained more clearly.
i don't read this in anyway as glorifying anorexia, it is an admission that anorexia is all emcompasing and damaging to those who suffer. it is an admission that Meshels thought had been influenced by her own mental illness and what she believed and her thought processes around food are incorrect (a staple of many mental illnesses) and that what she was experiencing is just as painful.
she is simply explaining how mental illness has shaped every thought she may have about food, and that both of them were suffering.
It seems I may be the only person who doesn't find this article overly amazing. Although I can appreciate the ED side of the article, I can't enjoy it as my mind is stuck on two points.
Firstly, Why did you include the section about the Holocaust survivor? More than just mentioning what you were doing prior to the burger, you mentioned his torment with being starved. I feel like you are trying to validate your own experiences based on his - which is not only insensitive but so wrong.
Secondly, I am gobsmacked about the picture you painted of the mentally ill. How incredibly rude and completely unnecessary.
I feel like these were two topics of human behaviour/history which deserve their own article and trying to weasle little throw away comments on them do not portray the compassionate tone you are trying to achieve in relation to ED's.
I know your post is old, just wanted to add, I had to ignore the Holocaust references as I felt ill reading them in the same space as eating disorders.
Oh i know! I was completely blown away by it. And all these comments below were praising the article and I was just thinking "HOW?!" lol!
It's an interesting element to me. I spent 12 years battling an eating disorder and I think I understand the reference but don't think it's really explained.
I am a smart and sensible, now adult. I was an adult for 6 years of my eating disorder. I studied history and knew what I was compulsively was doing was stupid ( I honestly believe all ED sufferers do). I wrote a thesis on the holocaust, writing about the starvation and feeling guilty as hell that I envied people who didn't eat, I wanted to be aneorexic (yet never realising I was). I saw the contradiction of my existence and I think it's this contradiction she is hinting at. Pointing out how well people know but can't act in the horrors they force on themselves.
Does that make sense?
Lucy, thank you. I am not sure I totally understand but I do appreciate your comments and thoughtfulness in explaining your experiences. It is appreciated:)