Victoria Police recently announced that family violence perpetrators will be treated as seriously as terrorists and murderers.
This strategy represents a major milestone in the evolving police approach to family violence. Though family violence results in far more death and injury, terrorism is nonetheless considered Australia’s leading security threat.
The Victoria Police strategy represents an opportunity to reset security priorities by recognising family violence as the foremost contributor to the preventable death and injury of women and children.
Acknowledging family violence’s harms.
Following in the footsteps of those who have noted the similarities between terrorism and family violence – using such terms as “intimate terrorism” and “everyday terrorism” to make this point – Victoria Police’s acting chief commissioner Shane Patton said:
… the consequences of family violence are the same as terrorism … We have death, we have serious trauma, we have serious injury and we have people impacted for the rest of their lives.
However, the scope of the harms of “everyday terrorism” are far more widespread.
Between 2002-03 and 2011-12, 488 women were killed across Australia in homicides perpetrated by their current or former partners. In the previous two decades, five people were killed in terrorist attacks in Australia.
In contrast, on average at least one woman is killed in Australia each week, usually by an intimate (ex-)partner.
Family violence is the leading preventable contributor to death, disability and illness in women aged 15–44. It is responsible for more disease burden than high blood pressure, smoking, and obesity.
Victoria Police research that informed its strategy indicates that in the past six years, more than 11,000 perpetrators harmed three or more victims.
In 2016-17, there has been 16 family violence killings in Victoria. This represents 28% of all homicides.
Shifting police practice.
As the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system, police are critical in shaping the community understandings of crime. If the police don’t take a crime or threat seriously, it’s likely the public won’t either.
Top Comments
This is incredible progress, finally the holistic impact of IPV is being addressed. (Cue the MRA posters here though, wanting to blame women).
Where have people on here blamed women??
I think I was the first poster here, but this is the sort of article the usual MRAs inevitably attempt refocus the argument on female perpetrators and the erroneous stat of 1-in-3, I order to detract from the main issue.
And by refocus you mean acknowledging men are victims to?
I would have thought the main issue would be stopping all DV.
I think, speaking as the wife of a police officer, the major issues includd the lack of resources and well as alcohol and drugs as a contributing factor.
Officers spend hours and hours dealing with the paperwork related to DV and more often than not alcohol or drugs are involved. They spend all this time removing an offended from the premises and process paperwork which takes them hours then the next day the wife or partner wants to drop charges when everyone is sober and they feel guilty, so the police have to stop the case.
I have lost hours with my husband in the last few weeks because he is stuck at work doing overtime because of DV. Yes he gets paid, but it doesn't stop my lying awake at midnight listening for the front door to open. it's time they get properly resourced and equipped to deal with this systemic issue as they are just as frustrated with the system as we all are.