A diagnosis should not come with a side of shame.
Arguably the most shameful of cancers on the list of organs and appendages is lung cancer.
“Was he/she a smoker?” they ask upon hearing the desperate news. The answer dependant on whether it was just pure bad luck or just desserts.
A reader recently told me of her husband who was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer of the lung having never had a cigarette in his life. Another girlfriend who is a GP, had to break the news to a friend who came into her practice with a cough from what she thought was a cold she couldn’t shake; a mother of young children, a non smoker, just bloody unlucky.
I was horrified. “That’s so unfair. I don’t understand how that happens? It’s just so unfair”.
When my father-in-law was diagnosed it somehow made more sense, while he hadn’t had a cigarette in 15 years, I knew he was once a regular smoker. The cigarettes the culprit, a ‘reason’. That’s the thing with cancer, people want a reason. They need it to make sense.
Top Comments
A person on the sidelines finding out 'why' is purely self defence mechanism - we are petrified of it happening to us. Because if you can tell yourself that you "know" why someone got cancer-X; if you can justify "why" a tragedy happened to one person over another; then you can start to relax and let yourself breath a sign of relief because you don't fit that criteria, therefore it "can't" happen to you. Its about protecting ourselves from the fear of the disease or death
People are scared of cancer. If they don't have it and find out about someone getting it they want to know the likely cause. They do this so that they can avoid that cause, or feel slightly safer because they aren't exposed to it. It is the same reason for people asking why in relation to any tragedy.