Former Australian sex workers who have spoken out about their experiences in the sex industry, claiming human rights violations are rampant, say they have been harassed and targeted by pro-prostitution groups since coming forward.
A controversial new book titled Prostitution Narratives — Stories of Survival in the Sex Trade details accounts of rape, assault, blackmail and coercion.
Former sex workers Alice* and Simone Watson say the book is a way for their voices to be heard and for the curtain to be lifted on an industry that caters to pimps but does little to protect the rights of workers.
The women are fighting against the legalisation of prostitution, saying it is a myth that sex workers are safer under this model, and are pushing for safe exit strategies for women who wish to leave.
Ms Watson said “illegal” street sex workers had more rights than women working in a legal brothel because they had more control over who they chose to accept or decline as clients and could negotiate their own payment.
“People on the street can negotiate pay better than workers in the industry,” she said.
“People hear decriminalisation and they think it will make the industry safer, but this is just catering to the pimps.
Alice said when she worked in the industry she was blackmailed, had clients make sexually violent requests of her and was subjected to clients who expressed a desire to play out pre-pubescent fetishes.
Top Comments
I'm confused. They are against legalization, and decriminalization; what do they want? Prohibition? Surely that doesn't help workers either, and puts more money and power in the hands of 'pimps' (whatever that is) anyway.
I happily support these ladies (and men?) and believe their stories of trauma and pain, and I do think that things can change in the services provided to workers. But attacking the structures, the laws, that keep them out of jail seems counter-intuitive to me.
They support the nordic model of prostitution reform. It decriminalises those who have been prostituted and provides them with social services such as housing, education, health care, including mental health care and alcohol/drug addiction services, childcare, job training, etc. And helps those who seek to exit to actually be able to do so and earn enough money without prostitution, it doesn't criminalize any who stay in prostitution/don't want these interventions. It criminalizes johns and pimps so that their victims can call police against them and seek justice, where it takes fines from the johns and confiscates the proceeds of crime from the pimps/traffickers to help fund the model, police have been re-trained to work with prostituted people against their exploiters and abusers rather than arresting prostituted. It provides johns who have been charged with abusing prostituted people with 'john school' which teaches them about the law and the harms they cause to their victims etc in the hopes of deterring exploitation/demand for exploitation. In sweden where the model originated trafficking has greatly reduced along with violence against prostituted person boasting not a single prostituted person murdered by pimp or john since its introduction in 1999, it is no longer an attractive destination for trafficking as the pimps cant expect to make money off of prostituted people there they can be reported and charged with pimping, the over-all number of prostituted people has reduced since many took advantage of the robust social services and exit supports made available to them and the price of sex has risen in response which allows the prostituted to have more control over the interaction and more ability to turn down the most abusive clients rather than having to put up with it due to relying on the johns' favour of them.