1. Conscience vote on gay marriage
Outgoing Federal Senator Sue Boyce has told The Courier Mail she believes Prime Minister Tony Abbott will likely allow a conscience vote on gay marriage by the end of the year. “I would be reasonably confident that we will get to the situation by the end of the year that the Liberal Party will allow a conscience vote on (gay marriage),” Senator Boyce said. “On that basis, I would expect any legislation would come before Parliament quickly soon after that and it would get voted on. And I would hope that with the number of Liberals who would support same-sex marriage, also with those from Labor and the Greens who support same-sex marriage, that there would be a majority vote.”
2. Rolf Harris trial
The Judge has begun giving directions to the jury in the trial of Rolf Harris has said he will not accept a majority rule but only a unanimous verdict on each of the 12 indictments. Rolf Harris is accused of 12 counts of indecent assault against four separate women. He denies all charges. Judge Nigel Sweeney instructed the jury to find Harris guilty or innocent on all 12 or on some of the 12 but a decision on each had to be agreed to by all 12 jurors. He is expected to give further instructions tonight and then the jury will retire to consider its verdict.
3. Bayden-Clay was “broke”
Gerard Bayden-Clay told a police officer that he and his wife were “on the bones of their arse” and she had only $20 in her bank account according to evidence before the court yesterday. The 43-year-old QLD real estate agent is accused of murdering his wife Allison Baden-Clay, also 43, on April 19, 2012. He has pleaded not guilty. The jury also heard the he told a police officer the cuts across his cheeks were from a shaving mishap. The officer told the court that he searched for evidence of a shaving accident – such as blood or tissues – but did not find any. The case continues.
Top Comments
It sounds to me like Australia Post should be looking at its executive salaries. Ahmed Fahour was paid 4.8 million dollars last year, taxpayer funded no less, which is 10 times his counterparts in the US and Canada, who run much bigger operations.
Sounds like yet another case of a massively overpaid CEO not up to the job.
#15. Hmm, really? Yeah, sorry, I dont think so. I really cant see how spending a night with their Father is going to cause brain damage?! And what about all the benefits that they would get out of having a good, supportive, loving relationship with their Dad? Wouldnt that out-weigh any supposed 'brain damage'?
Does it also mean you can't leave the kids with grandparents, friends, aunts & uncles, etc.?
No more nights out for "primary caregivers", for fear of brain damaged children?
I must have missed no. 15 earlier - or was it added later? How ridiculous. I am a 55 year old whose parents divorced when I was 18 months old - unusual for those days. I was an only child and spent weekends initially and then the school holidays with my father (I flew between Melbourne and Brisbane as an unaccompanied minor from the age of 3) Those days with my dad were the happiest days of my childhood. What "brain damage" is it they are talking about precisely? I have since gone on to have a successful marriage of almost 30 years and three children myself. I sometimes wonder if so-called "experts" and psychologists are the ones with the major issues.
There is solid research on neural pathway development and building secure attachments in very young children. No one can aspire to perfect parenting, life is messy, but I don't understand how anyone can be annoyed by the concept of research into best practices for optimal child development. This specific article is regarding children under the age of four, an age from which most adults retain scant if any memories but in which time our innate view of the world is formed. The 'brain damage' sensationally referred to is the lack of effectively formed neural pathways, eg. associations between a sense of home and a sense of consistency, and specifically refers to children being raised in more than one home on a weekly basis, not the occasional sleepover.