We’ve rounded up all the latest stories from Australia and around the world – so you don’t have to go searching.
1. Cole Miller’s accused said to have been out “hunting for people to assault”.
A day after the tragic death of Cole Miller, 18 from a one-punch assault in Brisbane’s Fortitude Valley there are reports that one of his accused Daniel Maxwell, 21, asked a friend “Do you want to see something funny?” just moments before he was assaulted.
The Courier Mail reports that Maxwell was part of a group of four men who allegedly attacked three people and allegedly attempted to assault another two before coming upon Cole Miller and his friend Nick Pace.
Detective Senior Constable Amanda Foster told the court yesterday Maxwell was a “callous” brute who enjoyed taunting his victims.
Police allege Maxwell first struck Cole and then Nick Pace. They say another man, Armstrong Renata, 21 punched Cole in the side of the face as he was still recovering from the first attack.
Yesterday Cole Miller’s father Steven paid tribute to his late son.
“It is with deep sadness that I announce that our 18-year-old son Cole has today passed away as a result of massive brain trauma,”
“He has struggled bravely in the Intensive Care Unit of the Royal Brisbane Hospital and our family and many close friends have been by his side since the incident.
“Cole was beautiful, brave young man, with his whole life yet to be lived.”
Constable Foster told the court that the accused, Daniel Maxwell’s remark “personifies the disregard (Maxwell) has for other members of the public and the consequences of his violent behaviour.”
Top Comments
What is it with these Daeshbags making stupid threats while wearing gimp-suits? It can't be an intentional self-parody, can it?
As an adult child of a financially dependent, long term unemployed parent, who left high school after year 9, was also raised by an out of work single parent themselves (also didn't complete their education), I have to say, I agree with number 8 - especially this statement: 'If someone’s on a parenting payment, they should be looking after existing children not having more children.'
If you don't have an independent means of income, recovering from this should be your priority. If you can't provide for yourself of existing children, that is not the time to be looking to expand / bring someone else into the world and extend the hardship. Otherwise the cycle of inter-generational poverty perpetuates.
Of course, it is different if you already have children and find yourself out of income temporarily due to circumstances beyond your control. It happens. But that is most often the exception, not the rule.
Thankfully, education and sheer motivation/ determined pursuit of a better way of life lifted me and my sibling out of our family cycle.
Yes, but why are we looking to only limit the behaviour of females? After all, the male can propagate his seed far more extensively than she can in the same gestational period. And what of the male who helped put her in this position? Why doesn't the male have to go on contraception to get welfare payments? Wouldn't the goal be more effective if the males were targeted?
As much as every woman is a victim these days, she is still responsible for her own reproductive system. We could of course, neuter any male deemed unfit to reproduce.
Why is it only the women who have to be temporarily sterilised??
good point.