Once again, the Australian Christian Lobby has shown that they are not only out of step with community values, they are out of step with Christian values.
Alys Gagnon, an editor at the Mamamia Women’s Network and a church-going Christian, explains why she is furious at the reaction of the Australian Christian Lobby to Ireland’s successful referendum on same-sex marriage.
Last night, Ireland, a traditionally conservative Catholic nation, voted overwhelmingly in a referendum of its citizens in favour of same sex marriage.
The Australian Christian Lobby greeted this news by saying, “the redefinition of marriage and family in Ireland this weekend is a wake-up call to Australians who value the rights of children and freedom of belief.
“Australia should not pass a law which forces millions of Australians to pretend that a same-sex couple with children is the same thing as a mother and father with children.”
Make no mistake. This is nothing more than bigotry dressed up as concern for children.
The ACL is a small organisation and can lay no legitimate claim to the notion of being the Christian voice of Australia. It doesn’t disclose its source of funding, but the rumours of being supported by a couple of old blokes from some conservative evangelical churches in rural Queensland have been floating around for years. Arguably, it’s the voice of a few old rich men than it is of any kind of Christianity I have ever been exposed to.
Top Comments
It is concerning and SAD that the writer decided to pick and choose parts of the Bible/Christianity, not its entirety then twisted to deceived readers in support of God/Christians is pro homo-marriage. BTW I'm not an ACL member ...
For a start Jesus was never a Social Rebel nor embraced the World system/paradigm, especially with sins he is non-compromising; He follows the Faith & Culture of Judaism, got circumcised, baptised in the river, goes to the Synagogue, showed up at social events, the famous Canaan wedding (a Man & a Woman) and produced His first miracle, best wine ever. Let me add this, Jesus dresses appropriately, there's no Tattoos, Ear/Nose Rings, etc. Jesus also do not support divorce and remarriages. Although he was single, he wasn't a member of AshleyMadison.com looking for affairs. C'mon, that's not a Social Rebel profile.
But what is most astonishing about Jesus, He uses His Free-will as a human being on earth to follow His Father's Will to the Cross, He doesn't embraced nor follow the thinking of that period and He certainly do not compromises when it comes to people living in sins.
One thing for sure that He loves to hang out with sinners, He wants people to accept Go's love and forgiveness and turned from their sinful way, if you read your Bible homosexuality is one of those sins.
From the beginning of the Bible, if you are claiming to be a believer, the first union in the Garden was between Adam and Eve, a man and a woman, NOT Adam and Steve will never be Elton John and his wife David.
Genesis 1:28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number;fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
Is that possible with a homo-marriage?
Certainly NOT, asks yourself a question after reading the Bible, did Jesus ever encourage repented sinners to sin "some more" OR "No More"?
I can appreciate what you're saying, and your intent. Obviously, you're passionate about your faith and you're passionate about equality - but a point missing from this, which is the core problem of the whole situation, is that it doesn't matter what or who your Jesus did, is or stood for. The point is, that it shouldn't come into the legal argument for same sex marriage at all. I agree with you completely that this 'squeaky wheel' is giving the impression that Christians are against marriage equality, which is incorrect, obviously. But, despite your efforts to show that they do support it, and that if they don't they should because Jesus... your Bible, your Jesus and your God are for you - not the law. Marriage equality should be a legal issue and nothing else. I don't know why religion is part of the argument. It didn't create marriage, it took it. I'm atheist - but this argument isn't about lefty atheists getting what they want, it's about a right only afforded to a select group of people for no reasons that make sense.